Biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An assessment of current practices in precision oncology in the community setting—A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (EAQ161CD).

Authors

null

Julia Rachel Trosman

Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

Julia Rachel Trosman , Jorean Sicks , Christine B. Weldon , Gregory J. Tsongalis , Bruce Rapkin , Kathryn E. Weaver , Gary Irvin Cohen , Thomas E. Lad , Emily Van Meter Dressler , Bill Stanfield , Judith O. Hopkins , Judy Hancock , Heather Kehn , Preston D. Steen , Lynne I. Wagner , Ruth Carlos

Organizations

Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, Brown Univeristy, Providence, RI, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, Cancer Center At GBMC, Baltimore, MD, Cook County Health and Hospital System, Chicago, IL, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, NSABP/NRG Oncology, and Novant Helath Forsyth Medical Center/Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Winston Salem, NC, Cancer Research for the Ozarks, Springfield, MO, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, St. Louis Park, MN, Roger Maris Cancer Center, Fargo, ND, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: Molecular biomarker testing is integral to NSCLC cancer care, but adoption and testing practices in the community are varied and often suboptimal. Testing practices, such as standard testing protocols and results turnaround time (TAT), impact timely treatment decisions. We examined adoption and testing practices for guideline recommended NSCLC biomarkers among National Cancer Institute Community Research Program (NCORP) sites. The study was conducted in collaboration with Wake Forest NCORP Research Base. Methods: An online survey was administered to onsite labs affiliated with NCORP sites April 2019 – June 2020. We assessed testing practices for 7 NCCN recommended biomarkers, including 3 with category 1 recommendation (EGFR, ALK, PD-L1) and 4 with category 2 recommendations (BRAF, ROS1, MET, RET). Guideline concordant result TAT was defined as return of EGFR and ALK results in ≤ 10 days (Lindeman 2018) (see Table for other outcomes). We used proportions, including two-sided Fischer exact tests, to compare outcomes by site characteristics (safety net, practice size). Results: The survey response rate was 69% (58/85). All responding labs offered testing for category 1 biomarkers (EGFR, ALK and PD-L1); only 10% conducted these tests in-house (Table). The majority of labs also tested for category 2 biomarkers (67%). TAT varied, with most labs returning results in ≤ 10 days for EGFR and ALK (69%, but only a minority meet this TAT for all biomarkers. Larger practice size (> 1400 new cancer cases a year) was associated with in-house testing of EGFR, ALK, PD-L1 (p=0.03) and having standard testing protocols (p<0.001). Safety net affiliation did not significantly impact practices. Conclusions: We found universal adoption of NCCN category 1 biomarkers among the labs affiliated with NCORP sites, with the majority meeting guideline concordant results TAT. There is opportunity for improvement in adoption of category 2 biomarkers and result TAT, for example, by using standard testing protocols. Reassuringly, no difference in testing practices was detected by safety net affiliation.

Outcome
Total, %, N=58
% Safety net (N=21),

% non-Safety-net, p
% Smaller (N=25),

% larger, p
Test EGFR, ALK and PD-L1 (category 1)
100
100, 100, *
100, 100, *
Test for EGFR, ALK, PD-L1 in-house
10
19, 5, .2
0, 18, .03
Test for BRAF, ROS1, MET and RET (category 2)
67
71, 65, .8
68, 67, .9
TAT for EGFR, ALK ≤10 days
69
62, 73, .4
68, 70, .9
TAT for all biomarkers ≤10 days
36
24, 43, .2
32, 39, .6
Standard testing protocol
48
52, 46, .8
20, 70, .0002

* No p value.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Quality Improvement

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr e18649)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e18649

Abstract #

e18649

Abstract Disclosures