Patterns in cancer management changes for patients with COVID-19 in northern California.

Authors

null

Michael Glover

Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA

Michael Glover , Julie Wu , Daniel H Kwon , Sylvia Zhang , Solomon Henry , Douglas Wood , Daniel Rubin , Hala Borno , Eric Jay Small , Lidia Schapira , Vadim S Koshkin , Sumit Shah

Organizations

Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, Stanford Cancer Center, Palo Alto, CA, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, University of California, San Francisco, CA, Stanford Cancer Center Research Database, Stanford, CA, Stanford Cancer Center Research Database, Palo Alto, CA, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, Stanford University and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, University of California San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA

Research Funding

Other
Stanford Cancer Center

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affected oncology practice in ways that are still evolving. In particular, COVID-19 has led to changes in cancer treatment for patients (pts) infected with COVID, which may have long-term implications for both COVID and cancer-related outcomes. In this retrospective analysis, we describe changes in cancer management over time for cancer pts diagnosed with COVID-19 at two academic institutions in Northern California. Methods: Adult and pediatric pts diagnosed with COVID-19 receiving active cancer management, defined as therapy/surgery/diagnostics within 3 weeks of COVID diagnosis, were identified through the EMR. Patients whose care was affected by COVID-19 were identified and analyzed for significant intra-group differences with regards to management type, treatment intent, and the time of COVID-19 diagnosis (“early” was defined as March to June 2020 and “late” as July 2020 to January 2021). The duration and characteristics of such changes were compared across subgroups. Chi-squared test was used to compare the incidence of delays between subgroups. Results: Among 134 COVID-positive pts on active cancer management, 83 (62%) had significant changes in management that consisted primarily of treatment delays. More delays were identified in patients treated with curative intent earlier in the course of the pandemic compared to later (OR 4.1, p=0.022). This difference was not seen among pts treated with palliative intent. In addition, pts on oral (PO) therapy were significantly less likely to have treatment changes than those on IV/IM therapy (OR 0.32, p=0.005). This difference was driven by a decrease in management changes for those on PO therapy in the later time period (OR 0.27, p=0.026). Pts diagnosed later were more likely to have delays due to clinical reasons rather than institutional policy (OR 6.2, P<.005). The median delay in both time frames was 21 days. Comparison of subgroups is shown in the table. Conclusions: We found significant changes in management of cancer pts with COVID-19 that evolved over time. Oncologists have become increasingly willing to continue therapy for cancer pts treated with curative intent and pts on oral therapy. Changes in cancer therapy have become more frequently related to patient clinical status, and less so due to institutional policies. It will be important to analyze how these changes in management are ultimately reflected in cancer outcomes in order to equip patients and oncologists to react to the next pandemic.

Characteristic
Active cancer management (N=134)
Incidence of delay in management (N=83)
P Value for delays (N=83)
Date
 March-June
55 (41%)
38 (46%)
0.21
 July-January
80 (60 %)
45 (54%)
Management
 IV/IM Therapy
56 (42%)
40 (48%)
.04*
 PO therapy
58 (43%)
26 (31%)
 Other
20 (15%)
17 (20%)
Intent
 Curative
51 (38%)
27 (33%)
0.09
 Palliative
83 (62%)
56 (67%)
Reason
 Clinical
41 (49%)
 Non-clinical
42 (51%)

*(IV/IM vs PO).

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Care Delivery and Regulatory Policy

Track

Care Delivery and Quality Care

Sub Track

Care Delivery

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 1535)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.1535

Abstract #

1535

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Maeve Smart

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Limited health literacy in Hispanic caregivers of children with cancer and childhood cancer survivors.

First Author: Paula Aristizabal

First Author: Ashley Khouri

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Antitumor regimens with gemcitabine are safe for tumor patients with COVID-19.

First Author: Yuanqiang Wu