Dose escalation for mitigating diarrhea: Ranked tolerability assessment of anti-diarrheal regimens in patients receiving neratinib for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors

null

Gavin M. Marx

University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Gavin M. Marx , Amy Jo Chien , José A. García-Sáenz , Arlene Chan , Manuel Ruiz-Borrego , Carlos Hernando Barcenas , Michael P. Thirlwell , Maureen E. Trudeau , Ron Bose , Daniel Egle , Barbara Pistilli , Johanna Wassermann , Kerry A. Cheong , Dieter Semsek , Christian F. Singer , Daniel Hunt , Utpal Khambholja , Feng Xu , Naisargee Shah , Adam Brufsky

Organizations

University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain, Breast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Perth & Curtin University, Nedlands, Australia, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, ON, Canada, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, University Frauenklinik Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France, Adelaide Cancer Centre, Adelaide, Australia, Praxis am Diakonie Krankenhaus Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Freiburg, Germany, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Puma Biotechnology Inc., Los Angeles, CA, Puma Biotechnology Inc., San Francisco, CA, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Puma Biotechnology Inc.

Background: The primary tolerability concern with neratinib (NERLYNX®; N), an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is diarrhea. Data from the multi-cohort, open-label, phase 2 CONTROL trial [Barcenas et al. Ann Oncol 2020] demonstrated significant improvement in grade 3 diarrhea and diarrhea-related discontinuations vs the ExteNET trial, which did not mandate anti-diarrheal prophylaxis. We report a systematic analysis of tolerability in CONTROL and ExteNET. Methods: Patients (pts) ≥18y with stage I–IIIc HER2+ breast cancer received N (240 mg/d po for 1y) after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy and were enrolled sequentially into cohorts assessing different modalities to mitigate diarrhea. Cohorts with complete data were included: loperamide (L); L+budesonide (BL); L+colestipol (CL); CL as needed (CL-PRN); and N dose escalation (DE; 120 mg/d on d1–7, 160 mg/d on d8–14, and 240 mg/d thereafter). Integrated ranking (IR) analysis was performed on 13 endpoints in 4 domains (exposure, diarrhea, adverse events [AEs], quality of life [QoL]) identified with input from clinicians; cohorts were ranked from 1 (best) to 5 (worst). Index scores (IS) based on individual pt data from CONTROL were calculated as supportive analysis to confirm selection of the regimen with best overall tolerability, which was then compared with ExteNET. Results: Of the 5 CONTROL cohorts evaluated, DE ranked best for most endpoints. Average ranks per IR method: L 3.4; BL 3.2; CL 3.0; CL-PRN 3.3; DE 2.0. The IS analysis supported DE as the cohort with best overall tolerability. Comparison of CONTROL DE vs ExteNET showed improvement in tolerability in all domains (table). Conclusions: These analyses suggest superiority of weekly DE vs other anti-diarrheal strategies. A lower rate of grade 3 diarrhea was observed with CONTROL DE vs ExteNET (13.3 vs 39.9%, respectively), as well as a comparable or improved AE profile. The data also reveal greater compliance with N (fewer early discontinuations, longer treatment duration, higher cumulative dose) and reduced impact on QoL with DE, suggesting improved tolerability. Clinical trial information: NCT02400476

ExteNET vs CONTROL DE.

ExteNET
(n=1408)
CONTROL DE
(n=60)
Exposure

Treatment duration 25th percentile, months

Mean cumulative dose, mg


2.5

54,193.9


11.1

67,364.0
Diarrhea, n (%)

Grade 3 diarrhea*

Discontinuation due to diarrhea during first 3m of treatment

Incidence of all-grade diarrhea


562 (39.9)

1204 (14.5)

1343 (95.4)


8 (13.3)

2 (3.3)

59 (98.3)
AEs, n (%)**

TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation

Grade 3 vomiting

Grade 3 nausea

Grade 3 abdominal pain

Grade 3 fatigue

Grade 3 decreased appetite

Grade 3 constipation
388 (27.6)

47 (3.3)

26 (1.8)

24 (1.7)

23 (1.6)

3 (0.2)

0
8 (13.3)

1 (1.7)

0

0

1 (1.7)

0

0
QoL

FACT-B mean change from baseline at month 1
–4.6
–3.0

*1 pt had grade 4 diarrhea in ExteNET; no grade 4 diarrhea in CONTROL DE. **No grade 4 events observed.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Adjuvant Therapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02400476

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 536)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.536

Abstract #

536

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures