University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Gavin M. Marx , Amy Jo Chien , José A. García-Sáenz , Arlene Chan , Manuel Ruiz-Borrego , Carlos Hernando Barcenas , Michael P. Thirlwell , Maureen E. Trudeau , Ron Bose , Daniel Egle , Barbara Pistilli , Johanna Wassermann , Kerry A. Cheong , Dieter Semsek , Christian F. Singer , Daniel Hunt , Utpal Khambholja , Feng Xu , Naisargee Shah , Adam Brufsky
Background: The primary tolerability concern with neratinib (NERLYNX®; N), an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is diarrhea. Data from the multi-cohort, open-label, phase 2 CONTROL trial [Barcenas et al. Ann Oncol 2020] demonstrated significant improvement in grade 3 diarrhea and diarrhea-related discontinuations vs the ExteNET trial, which did not mandate anti-diarrheal prophylaxis. We report a systematic analysis of tolerability in CONTROL and ExteNET. Methods: Patients (pts) ≥18y with stage I–IIIc HER2+ breast cancer received N (240 mg/d po for 1y) after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy and were enrolled sequentially into cohorts assessing different modalities to mitigate diarrhea. Cohorts with complete data were included: loperamide (L); L+budesonide (BL); L+colestipol (CL); CL as needed (CL-PRN); and N dose escalation (DE; 120 mg/d on d1–7, 160 mg/d on d8–14, and 240 mg/d thereafter). Integrated ranking (IR) analysis was performed on 13 endpoints in 4 domains (exposure, diarrhea, adverse events [AEs], quality of life [QoL]) identified with input from clinicians; cohorts were ranked from 1 (best) to 5 (worst). Index scores (IS) based on individual pt data from CONTROL were calculated as supportive analysis to confirm selection of the regimen with best overall tolerability, which was then compared with ExteNET. Results: Of the 5 CONTROL cohorts evaluated, DE ranked best for most endpoints. Average ranks per IR method: L 3.4; BL 3.2; CL 3.0; CL-PRN 3.3; DE 2.0. The IS analysis supported DE as the cohort with best overall tolerability. Comparison of CONTROL DE vs ExteNET showed improvement in tolerability in all domains (table). Conclusions: These analyses suggest superiority of weekly DE vs other anti-diarrheal strategies. A lower rate of grade 3 diarrhea was observed with CONTROL DE vs ExteNET (13.3 vs 39.9%, respectively), as well as a comparable or improved AE profile. The data also reveal greater compliance with N (fewer early discontinuations, longer treatment duration, higher cumulative dose) and reduced impact on QoL with DE, suggesting improved tolerability. Clinical trial information: NCT02400476
ExteNET (n=1408) | CONTROL DE (n=60) | |
---|---|---|
Exposure Treatment duration 25th percentile, months Mean cumulative dose, mg | 2.5 54,193.9 | 11.1 67,364.0 |
Diarrhea, n (%) Grade 3 diarrhea* Discontinuation due to diarrhea during first 3m of treatment Incidence of all-grade diarrhea | 562 (39.9) 1204 (14.5) 1343 (95.4) | 8 (13.3) 2 (3.3) 59 (98.3) |
AEs, n (%)** TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation Grade 3 vomiting Grade 3 nausea Grade 3 abdominal pain Grade 3 fatigue Grade 3 decreased appetite Grade 3 constipation | 388 (27.6) 47 (3.3) 26 (1.8) 24 (1.7) 23 (1.6) 3 (0.2) 0 | 8 (13.3) 1 (1.7) 0 0 1 (1.7) 0 0 |
QoL FACT-B mean change from baseline at month 1 | –4.6 | –3.0 |
*1 pt had grade 4 diarrhea in ExteNET; no grade 4 diarrhea in CONTROL DE. **No grade 4 events observed.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2019 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Carlos Hernando Barcenas
First Author: Nicholas Patrick McAndrew
2018 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Bent Ejlertsen
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Zhansheng Jiang