Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Deborah Schrag , Hajime Uno , Rachel Pam Greenerger Rosovsky , Cynthia Rutherford , Kristen Marie Sanfilippo , John L. Villano , Monic R Drescher , Nagesh H. Jayaram , Chris E. Holmes , Lawrence Eric Feldman , Ottavia Zattra , Christine Cronin , Ethan M. Basch , Anna Weiss , Jean M. Connors
Background: Previous randomized trials in cancer patients suggest that DOACs are non-inferior to LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE but have higher risk of bleeding. However, the balance of benefits and burdens remains uncertain. Objective: The CANVAS pragmatic trial compared recurrent VTE, bleeding and death in cancer patients following an initial VTE treated with either DOAC or LMWH therapy. Methods: CANVAS was an unblinded hybrid comparative effectiveness non-inferiority trial, with randomized and preference cohorts. Between 12/16 and 4/20, 671 participants were randomized and followed for 6-months. Between 12/16 and 12/17, 140 participants declined randomization, chose their preferred anticoagulant and were followed for 6-months. The preference cohort was closed when predetermined stopping criteria were met. Final follow-up was 11/30/20. Randomized patients were assigned 1:1 to receive either a DOAC or a LMWH. If assigned to LMWH, transitions to warfarin were allowed. Physicians and patients could choose among any DOAC or LMWH. Doses were suggested based on FDA-approved labeling but not mandated. Patients from 67 practices in the US with any invasive solid tumor, lymphoma, multiple myeloma or CLL and a diagnosis of symptomatic or radiographically detected VTE within 30 days of enrollment were eligible. The 1° analysis was conducted in the randomized modified-into to treat popululation, (all subjects who received study drug). The 1° outcome was recurrent VTE. The aim was to establish noninferiority of anticoagulation with a DOAC as defined by the upper limit of the 2-sided 90% CI for the difference in the event rate at 6 months of < 3%. Secondary outcomes included death and bleeding. Hypothesis testing included only the randomized cohort but propensity score adjusted results for the preference and combined cohorts are also shown. Results: The non-inferiority criteria for recurrent VTE was met. Conclusions: Among adult cancer patients with VTE, the use of a DOAC compared with a LMWH resulted in a noninferior risk of recurrent VTE with no differences in rates of bleeding or death in randomized patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02744092
CANVAS event rate at 6 months. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cohort | Endpoint | DOAC | LMWH | Difference (0.90 CI2) |
Randomized Cohort1 | (N = 330) | (N = 308) | ||
Recurrent VTE | 6.1% | 8.8% | -2.7% (-6.1%, 0.7%) | |
Major Bleeding3 | 4.6% | 4.6% | 0.0% (-2.7%, 2.7%) | |
Mortality | 21.5% | 18.4% | 3.1% (-2.1%, 8.3%) | |
Preference Cohort4 | (N = 107) | (N = 30) | ||
Recurrent VTE | 7.5% | 4.1% | 3.3% (-3.1%, 9.7%) | |
Major Bleeding3 | 11.5% | 3.0% | 8.5% (1.2%, 15.8%) | |
Mortality | 16.3% | 23.8% | -7.5% (-18.8%, 3.8%) | |
Combined Cohort | (N = 437) | (N = 338) | ||
Recurrent VTE | 6.4% | 7.8% | -1.3% (-4.4%, 1.7%) | |
Major Bleeding3 | 5.4% | 4.4% | 1.0% (-1.5%, 3.6%) | |
Mortality | 20.5% | 19.3% | 1.2% (-3.5%, 6.0%) |
1. analysis for hypothesis tesing 2. CI: Confidence interval 3. CTCAE grade 3-5 4. Adjusted by propensity score weighting.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Ulyana Dashkevych
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Lauren Reed-Guy
2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Akram Mesleh Shayeb
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Alice Talbot