Telemedicine use and satisfaction amongst radiation oncologists during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evaluation of current trends and future opportunities.

Authors

null

Alok Deshane

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH

Alok Deshane , Nicholas Damico , Michael Kharouta , Anna Wu , GI-Ming WANG , Mitchell Machtay , Aryavarta M. S. Kumar , Serah Choi , Aashish D. Bhatt

Organizations

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, University Hospitals, Case Medical Center - Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH

Research Funding

Other
University Hospitals Department of Radiation Oncology

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic telemedicine became an attractive alternative to in person appointments. The role of telemedicine in patients who undergo frequent on site treatment, such as radiation therapy, is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine telemedicine use, physician satisfaction and barriers to continued use in radiation oncology. Methods: An anonymous, electronic survey was distributed to radiation oncologists internationally. Participants described demographic and practice characteristics and a 5 point Likert scale assessed provider satisfaction, ease of use and overall utility of telemedicine. Analyses include descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test. Results: 232/5343 (4.3%) completed the survey, 63.8% of whom were male, 52.6% age 50 or younger and 78.0% from the United States (U.S.). Only 14.2% used Telemedicine previously, which increased to 93.1% during COVID-19. Amongst all telemedicine users, usage rates were 77.9% for initial consultations, 97.2% for follow-up visits, and 35.9% for on-treatment visits. 69.8% report that <25% of patients requiring treatment experienced delays due to COVID-19. Most conducted appointments from the workplace, with 40.1% also doing so from home. Satisfaction was high at 73.8%, perceived usefulness was 76.9% and 81.5% hope to continue using telemedicine after the pandemic. However, 82.4% had concerns with the inability to examine patients. Although 82.1 % believed that telemedicine would improve patient access to health care services overall, 63.0% were concerned with patient ability to access required technology. 49.5% had concerns regarding continued billing/reimbursement; less commonly at government centers (18.8%) compared to academic/satellite facilities (52.7%) and free-standing centers/community hospitals (50.7%), p=0.039 for both comparisons. These concerns were also significantly higher amongst US physicians (53.2% vs 34.9%, p=0.048). Conclusions: Widespread adoption of telemedicine by radiation oncologists occurred during COVID-19 with high rates of satisfaction and interest in continued use. Sustained reimbursement for telemedicine services is a significant concern, particularly in the US and outside of government facilities.

Demographic information of survey respondents.

Gender

n (%)
Age

n (%)
Country

n (%)
Subspecialization

n (%)
Practice Setting

n (%)
Male

148 (63.8%)
<41

55 (23.7%)
USA

182 (78.4%)
Breast

46 (19.8%)
Academic Center

100 (43.1%)
Female

84 (36.2%)
41-50

67 (28.9%)
Outside of USA

50 (21.6%)
CNS

36 (15.5%)
Academic Center Affiliate

42 (18.1%)

51-60

66 (28.4%)

Cutaneous

14 (6.0%)
Community Hospital

49 (21.1%)



61-70

39 (16.8%)

Gastrointestinal

25 (10.8%)
Free Standing Center

24 (10.3%)

70+

5 (2.2%)

Genitourinary

47 (20.3%)
Government Center

17 (7.3%)



Gynecologic

26 (11.2%)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Care Delivery and Regulatory Policy

Track

Care Delivery and Quality Care

Sub Track

Care Delivery

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr e13503)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e13503

Abstract #

e13503

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2022 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care access for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

First Author: Ying Ling

Abstract

2020 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Telehealth to expand access of oncology care in Utah during COVID-19 pandemic.

First Author: David Michael Gill

First Author: Avnish K Bhatia

Abstract

2021 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

A prospective multidisciplinary review of radiotherapy processes during the telemedicine era.

First Author: Rupesh Kotecha