Effects of weekly selinexor, bortezomib, dexamethasone (XVd) versus standard twice weekly bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) on RAS-mutated previously treated multiple myeloma (MM).

Authors

null

Christopher James Walker

Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc, Newton, MA

Christopher James Walker , Shirong Li , Yi Chai , Jatin J. Shah , Sharon Shacham , Suzanne Lentzsch , Yosef Landesman

Organizations

Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc, Newton, MA, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc., Newton, MA, Columbia University, New York, NY

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Activating mutations of the RAS genes NRAS, KRAS, and HRAS (RASmut) occur in up to 50% of MM and portend poor survival and high recurrence rates. MM cells with RASmut are susceptible to inhibition of germinal center kinase (GCK), resulting in IKAROS degradation independent of cereblon (CRBN). Selinexor is a selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound that can induce IKAROS degradation through CRBN-independent pathways to overcome immunomodulatory drug resistance. We explored the benefit of selinexor treatment for pts with RASmut MM. Methods: In the randomized BOSTON study, pts with MM after 1-3 therapies received weekly XVd or twice weekly Vd. In the single-arm STORM study pts with penta-treated, triple class refractory MM were treated with twice weekly Xd. Both treatment regimens are now FDA approved. Mutations were assessed post-hoc by exome sequencing of 119 and 52 pts from BOSTON and STORM, respectively. Pts were considered RASmut if their MM had NRAS, KRAS or HRAS mutations in codons 12, 13 or 61. Results: There were 54 pts (45%) with RASmut in BOSTON (XVd = 26, Vd = 28), and 17 (33%) in STORM. In BOSTON, pts with RASmut MM treated with XVd had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those treated with Vd (median [med] = 12.9 vs 6.7 months [mo], hazard ratio [HR] = 0.48 [95% CI 0.24-0.97], p = 0.039). For pts treated with Vd, those with RASmut had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) compared to RASwild-type (WT) (med = 16.8 mo vs not reached [NR], HR = 2.87 [95% CI 1.03-7.99], p = 0.035). PFS was not significantly different (med = 6.74 vs 9.82 mo, HR = 1.64 [95% CI 0.88-3.07], p = 0.122). Amongst pts on XVd, there was no difference in survival between RASmut and RASWT pts (PFS: med = 12.8 vs 12.9 mo, HR = 1.08 [95% CI 0.52-2.26], p = 0.83; OS: med = NR vs NR, HR = 0.94 [95% CI 0.36-2.45], p = 0.91). In STORM, pts with RASmut had shorter OS compared to RASwt pts (med = 6.1 vs NR, HR = 2.05 [95% CI 1.22-5.19], p = 0.010). Preliminary studies to explore the mechanisms of action related to RASmut MM sensitivity to XVd demonstrated that selinexor treatment in vitro leads to downregulation of GCK. Conclusions: Despite typically having the worst outcomes, pts with RASmut MM had a similar benefit from XVd as RASWT MM, showing that the XVd combination can overcome RASmut. Mechanistically, selinexor induced down regulation of GCK and enhanced killing of RASmut MM cells. With a manageable safety profile, the XVd regimen could provide a viable treatment option to improve survival of pts with MM with RAS mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT03110562


PFS
OS
p-value
HR (95% CI)
p-value
HR (95% CI)
BOSTON RASmut XVd vs Vd
0.039
0.48 (0.24-0.97)
0.22
0.57 (0.23, 1.41)
BOSTON XVd arm
RASmut vs RASWT
0.83
1.08 (0.52, 2.26)
0.91
0.94 (0.36, 2.45)
BOSTON Vd arm
RASmut vs RASWT
0.12
1.64 (0.88, 3.07)
0.035
2.87 (1.03, 7.99)
STORM (Xd)
RASmut vs RASWT
0.28
1.58 (0.69, 3.63)
0.010
2.51 (1.22, 5.19)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03110562

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 8027)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.8027

Abstract #

8027

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures