Crossover and rechallenge with pembrolizumab in recurrent patients from the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote-054 phase 3 trial, pembrolizumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma.

Authors

Alexander Eggermont

Alexander M. Eggermont

Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, Netherlands

Alexander M. Eggermont , Andrey Meshcheryakov , Victoria Atkinson , Christian U. Blank , Mario Mandalà , Georgina V. Long , Catherine Barrow , Anna Maria Di Giacomo , Rosalie Stephens , Shahneen Kaur Sandhu , Ragini Reiney Kudchadkar , Pablo L. Ortiz-Romero , Inge Marie Svane , Alexander Christopher Jonathan Van Akkooi , Clemens Krepler , Nageatte Ibrahim , Sandrine Marreaud , Michal Kicinski , Stefan Suciu , Caroline Robert

Organizations

Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, Netherlands, NN Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy, Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia, Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Wellington, New Zealand, Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Medical School, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, Netherlands, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif-Paris, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Merck Sharp &

Background: The phase 3 double-blind EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial evaluated pembrolizumab (pembro) vs placebo in stage III cutaneous melanoma patients (pts) with complete resection of lymph nodes. Pembro improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.57) and DMFS (HR 0.60) (Eggermont, NEJM 2018, TLO 2021). In the pembro group, the incidence of immune related AE (irAE) grade 1-5 was 37%, and of grade 3-5 was 7%. We present the safety profile, response rate and PFS for the subset of pts who had a recurrence and crossed over or were rechallenged with pembrolizumab, within protocol. Methods: Pts were randomized to receive iv. pembro 200 mg (N=514) or placebo (N=505) every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses (~1 year). Upon recurrence with no brain metastases, pts with an ECOG PS 0-2 were eligible to enter part 2 of the study, i.e. to receive pembro 200 mg iv. every 3 weeks for a maximum of 2 years, for crossover (those who received placebo) or rechallenge (those who recurred ≥6 months after completing one year of pembro therapy). Treatment was stopped in case of disease progression (RECIST 1.1) or unacceptable toxicity. Results: At the clinical cut-off (16-Oct-2020), 298 (59%) pts had a disease recurrence in the placebo group; 155 pts participated in the crossover part 2 of the trial. A total of 297 (58%) pts completed the 1-yr pembro adjuvant treatment, of whom 47 had a recurrence ≥6 mths from the stop of treatment and 20 entered in the rechallenge part of the trial. Among 175 pts who started pembro in Part 2, 160 discontinued due to completion of therapy (N=24), disease progression (N=88), toxicity (N=20), investigator's decision (N=21), or other reason (N=7); 15 pts were still on-treatment. Results for the 2 groups are provided in the table. The median number of doses was 12 and 5.5, respectively (resp), and the median follow-up was 41 and 19 mts, resp. Among the 175 pts, 51 (29%) had a grade 1-4 irAE (by group: 47 [30%] and 4 [20%] resp) and 11 (6%) a grade 3-4 irAE. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab treatment after crossover yielded a 39% ORR in evaluable pts and an overall 3-yr PFS of ̃32%, but after rechallenge the efficacy was lower.

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA The median PFS (95% CI) from start of Part 2 was 14 (5-27) and 8 (5-15) mts for stage III-resected and III/IV various, resp. Among the 80 stage IV crossover pts with evaluable disease, 31 (39%) had an objective response: 14 (18%) CR, 17 (21%) PR. The 2-yr PFS rate from response was 69% (95% CI 48-83%). For these 80 pts, the median PFS was 6.1 mts and the 3-yr PFS rate was 31% (95% CI 21-41%). Among 9 stage IV rechallenged pts with an evaluable disease, 1 (11%) reached CR, 3 had SD and 5 PD.Clinical trial information: NCT02362594


Crossover (N=155)
Rechallenge (N=20)
Stage at baseline of Part 2, n


III-resected
50
7
III/IV various
105
13
IV unresected
83
9
III-C unresected
10

IV resected
12
4
PFS events in Part 2, n
103
12
Median PFS (95% CI), mts
8.5 (5.7-15.2)
4.1 (2.6-NE)
3-yr PFS rate (95% CI), %
32 (25-40)
NE

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02362594

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 9500)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.9500

Abstract #

9500

Abstract Disclosures