Pyrotinib as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2+ breast cancer: A multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase II trial.

Authors

null

Xiaowen Ding

Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China

Xiaowen Ding , Wenju Mo , Xiaohong Xie , Ouchen Wang , Yuqin Ding , Shuai Zhao , Xiangming He , Weiliang Feng , Dehong Zou , Hongjian Yang

Organizations

Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China, Zhejiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.

Background: Pyrotinib is a new irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) which significantly improved the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this study we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients (pts) aged 18–70 years with invasive carcinoma, cT2-3N0-3M0 stage, HER2-positive breast cancer were included. We randomized 34 pts into the treatment group and 33 into the controlled group from 2019-2021. Pts in the treatment group received 6 cycles of pyrotinib 400mg + trastuzumab 6mg/kg (LD 8mg/kg) + docetaxel 75mg/m2 + carboplatin (AUC = 6mg/ml·min) (TCbH+Py) treatment while the controlled group received 6 cycles of trastuzumab 6mg/kg (LD 8mg/kg) + docetaxel 75mg/m2 + carboplatin (AUC = 6mg/ml·min) (TCbH). Total pathologic complete response (tpCR) was defined as no invasive or in situ disease in the breast or axilla (ypT0/Tis, ypN0) and was assigned to be the primary outcome (NCT03756064). Results: 51 cases had completed 6 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy and successfully underwent operation (21 in the treatment group and 30 in the controlled group). In the treatment group, 6 cases have not complete neoadjuvant therapy, 6 cases quitted because of poor compliance and 1 patient has not receive operation yet. For controlled group, 3 patients have not complete neoadjuvant therapy. The tpCR rate in the treatment group is 71.4% (15/21) versus 36.7% (11/30) in the controlled group. A significant difference was determined between the two groups (p < 0.05). All pts achieved an objective response in the treatment group while in the controlled group for about 83.3% (25/30). 4 cases showed stable disease (SD) and 1 case was evaluated as progressive disease (PD) in the controlled group. The most common AE in the treatment group is diarrhoea with grade 3 occurred in 6 cases (28.6%), most of this event limited in the first treatment cycle. In the controlled group 3 pts (10%) occurred grade 3 diarrhoea. Conclusions: In this study TCbH+Py neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved the tpCR rate of HER2+ breast cancer pts for about twice higher than TCbH with a manageable safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03756064

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Neoadjuvant Therapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03756064

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 574)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.574

Abstract #

574

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures