Uptake of genetic counseling and testing in a clinic based population of women with breast cancer.

Authors

null

Alexandra Wehbe

Wayne State University, Detroit, MI

Alexandra Wehbe , Mark A. Manning , Hadeel Assad , Kristen Purrington , Michael S. Simon

Organizations

Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University, Detroit, MI

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Carriers of pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes have an elevated risk of developing breast, ovarian, and other cancers.We conducted a medical record review to determine the uptake of genetic counseling and testing in a clinic-based population of women with breast cancer. Methods: Medical records of 150 women with breast cancer seen at the Karmanos Cancer Institute between January-December 2018 were reviewed to determine the proportion eligible for genetic testing according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We also assessed genetics referral rates, appointment completion and results of genetic testing. Using chi-square and ANOVA tests, we analyzed the association of demographic and clinical factors with eligibility and referral to genetic counseling. Results: The average age of diagnosis was 57.1 years old, with 68.7% of women diagnosed with stage I-III disease, and 31.3% diagnosed with stage IV disease. There were 91 (60.7%) women who met NCCN criteria for genetic testing, of which 46.2% ultimately underwent genetic testing. Eligible women were more likely to be younger (52.6 vs. 64.0 years old), White (75.0% vs. 54.5%), and have Medicaid (75.0%) or private insurance (72.9%) vs. Medicare (44.8%). Women who met NCCN criteria were 3.5 times more likely to be referred for genetic counseling than those that did not meet eligibility criteria. Women were also more likely to be referred if they had early-stage disease compared to stage IV (67.8% vs. 48.3%), and Medicaid or private insurance compared to Medicare (71.4%, 72.0% and 40.0%, respectively). Of eligible women, 59.3% had a genetic counseling appointment scheduled, and of those, 78.0% attended their appointment. There were no apparent differences in appointment completion based on race with similar percentages of Black and White women completing their appointments (74.0% and 77.0% respectively). Women with stage IV disease were more likely to complete their appointments (83.0%) compared to women with stages I-III (74.0%) and fewer women with Medicare completed their genetic counseling appointment (56.0%) compared to women with Medicaid (83.0%) and women with private insurance (83.0%). Among women who attended their appointment, 95.9% underwent genetic testing. Of women who had genetic testing, 8.5% had a pathogenic variant and 30.4% had a variant of unknown significance. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that lack of genetic counseling referrals contribute to a gap between the need for and completion of genetic testing. By understanding barriers to genetic counseling and testing, future clinical initiatives could effectively improve accessibility to genetic counseling services.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Prevention, Risk Reduction, and Hereditary Cancer

Track

Prevention, Risk Reduction, and Genetics

Sub Track

Cancer Genetics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 10524)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.10524

Abstract #

10524

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

BRCA testing in patients with breast cancer with Medicaid vs. commercial insurance.

First Author: Elena B. Elkin

First Author: Alec Czaplicki

First Author: Saad Javaid