Patient-reported quality of life data from patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil: Interim results of the TALLISUR study.

Authors

null

Meinolf Karthaus

Klinikum Neuperlach/Harlaching, Munich, Germany

Meinolf Karthaus , Albrecht Kretzschmar , Stefan Fuxius , Jorge Riera Knorrenschild , Florian Kaiser , Rolf Mahlberg , Manfred Welslau , Henning Pelz , Volker Heinemann

Organizations

Klinikum Neuperlach/Harlaching, Munich, Germany, Practice for hematology and oncology, MVZ Mitte, Leipzig, Germany, Tumor Center, Heidelberg, Germany, Universitatsklinikum, Giessen Und Marburg/Standort Marburg, Germany, VK&K Studienzentrum, Landshut, Germany, Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromaeerinnen, Trier, Germany, Praxis Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg, Germany, Ambulantes Therapiezentrum fuer Haematologie und Onkologie, Offenburg, Germany, University Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Servier Pharma Germany

Background: Compared to placebo, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) significantly improved overall and progression-free survival in patients (pts) with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the phase III RECOURSE trial. Although time to deterioration of ECOG performance status (PS) from 0/1 to ≥ 2 was significantly longer in pts treated with FTD/TPI, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was not formally assessed by direct means. Therefore, a two-arm trial with best supportive care (BSC) as appropriate comparative treatment was designed to specifically address the effect of FTD/TPI on HRQoL. Methods: In this prospective, multi-center, German, open-label, phase IV study, pts with pre-treated mCRC could choose between BSC or oral FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2bid on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day cycle). EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires were employed to assess HRQoL. Primary endpoint was the rate of responders with stabilized ( > -10 and < 10 scores) or improved (≥ 10 scores) response (RR). Response was calculated as the mean score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/ QoL scale from the 2nd cycle until the end of treatment/ observation compared to the baseline score. Results: Of 194 eligible pts, 185 pts chose treatment with FTD/TPI (median 3 cycles), while 9 pts decided to receive BSC only. Questionnaires from 109 pts receiving FTD/TPI and from 6 pts with BSC were evaluable for RR. The primary endpoint (RR) was 59.6% (95% CI 49.8 – 68.9) in FTD/TPI-treated pts and 50.0% (95% CI 11.8 – 88.2) in pts receiving BSC. Analysis of the extended follow-up period, demonstrated that RR was 67.0% (95% CI 57.3 – 75.7) in FTD/TPI-treated pts. In the FTD/TPI-group, median time to deterioration of HRQoL was 121 days (n = 61; 95% CI 87 – 151) according to EORTC QLQ-C30 and 119 days (n = 63; 95% CI 85 – 138) according to EQ-5D-5L. Conclusions: If pts can choose between treatment and BSC in late-stage CRC, the vast majority opts for treatment. According to the present results, FTD/TPI-treatment induced prolonged stabilization of HRQoL, a highly desired attribute of therapies for pts with late-stage cancer. Clinical trial information: No 2017-000292-83.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Epidemiology/Outcomes

Clinical Trial Registration Number

No 2017-000292-83

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 3526)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.3526

Abstract #

3526

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures