Cabozantinib versus other TKIs after CPI treatment in the real-world management of patients with mRCC.

Authors

null

Florence Marteau

IPSEN Pharma SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt Cedex, France

Florence Marteau , Brooke Harrow , Christine McCarthy , Joel Wallace , Alisha Monnette , Yunfei Wang , Gurjyot K. Doshi

Organizations

IPSEN Pharma SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt Cedex, France, Ipsen Inc, Cambridge, MA, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, Ile De France, France, Exelixis, Alameda, CA, McKesson, The Woodlands, TX, US Oncology Research, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands, TX, US Oncology, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Ipsen

Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are a treatment option for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but there is limited clinical data on the efficacy of targeted therapies following CPI treatment. Cabozantinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets multiple receptor kinases implicated in tumorigenesis. In the US, cabozantinib is approved for use in patients with advanced RCC including after CPI treatment. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study (NCT04353765) evaluated outcomes associated with cabozantinib or other TKIs (axitinib, lenvatinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib) in patients with mRCC following CPI treatment. Eligible patients initiated TKI therapy between May 1, 2016 and Sep 31, 2019 and had received a CPI as their last systemic treatment prior to TKI therapy. Patients were identified from the US Oncology Network iKnowMed electronic health record database through structured queries and a targeted chart review. The following real-world outcomes were assessed: 6-month response rate (RR6months; primary); overall response rate (ORR); overall survival (OS); time to treatment discontinuation (TTD); rates of dose reductions, and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). The p value for RR6months (χ2 test) was used to test for non-inferiority. Results: Eligible patients (n = 247) had a mean (SD) age of 65.9 (10.5) years and 74.1% were male; 75.7% (n = 187) received cabozantinib and 24.3% (n = 60) received other TKIs. All patients had intermediate or poor MSKCC score; more poor-risk patients received cabozantinib than other TKIs (28.9% vs 20%). Outcomes data are shown in the Table. Compared with other TKIs, cabozantinib was associated with a significantly higher RR6months and ORR, and TTD was twice as long with cabozantinib. Discontinuation due to AEs was more frequent with other TKIs than with cabozantinib, although this was not statistically significant; 21.7% of discontinuations occurred during the first 3 months of treatment. AEs leading to discontinuation were consistent with the known safety profile of the products. Conclusions: In this mRCC population receiving routine care in the US, cabozantinib was used more frequently than other TKIs after CPI treatment. Cabozantinib was an effective and well tolerated option post-CPI, with a high response rate in the real-world setting.abozantinib was associated with a significantly higher response rate and a lower discontinuation rate due to AEs; TTD was double that of other TKIs. Clinical trial information: NCT04353765


Cabozantinib (n = 187)
Other TKI (n = 60)
p value
RR6months, %
50.8
33.3
< 0.001
ORR, %
53.5
38.3
0.041
Overall survival rate, % (95% CI)
6 months

12 months

18 months
81.9 (75.5, 86.8)

61.5 (53.5, 68.4)

51.7 (43.1, 59.6)
75.1 (61.5, 84)

59.6 (44.7, 71.8)

45.9 (29.6, 60.7)
0.765
TTD, median months
6.2
3.1
0.015
Dose reductions, %
47.1
41.7
0.466
Discontinuation due to AEs, %
31.3
40.4
0.3143

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Kidney Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04353765

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr e16539)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e16539

Abstract #

e16539

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Florence Marteau

First Author: Jeffrey Thomas Yorio