Single-arm, phase 2 study of regorafenib plus nivolumab in patients with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR)/microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC).

Authors

null

Marwan Fakih

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA

Marwan Fakih , Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav , David Z. Chang , Johanna C. Bendell , Timothy Larson , Allen Lee Cohn , Timothy K. Huyck , David Cosgrove , Joseph A. Fiorillo , Lawrence E. Garbo , Shruthi Ravimohan , Von Potter , David D'Adamo , Neelesh Sharma , Ying A. Wang , Sabine Coppieters , Matthias Herpers , Carolina Soares Viana de Oliveira , Andrew Scott Paulson

Organizations

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, Minnesota Oncology/The US Oncology Network, Minneapolis, MN, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO, Nebraska Cancer Specialists, Omaha, NE, Division of Medical Oncology, Vancouver Cancer Center, Compass Oncology, Vancouver, WA, Willamette Valley Cancer Institute, Eugene, OR, New York Oncology Hematology, Albany, NY, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, Bristol-Myers Squibb, New Haven, CT, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, Bayer AG, Diegem, Belgium, ClinStat GmbH, Cologne, Germany, Texas Oncology/The US Oncology Network, Dallas, TX

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Bayer, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Ono

Background: The role of immunotherapy in the treatment of pMMR/MSS metastatic CRC is not established. A Japanese phase 1b trial in this setting showed the combination of regorafenib (multikinase inhibitor with immunomodulatory activity) plus nivolumab (anti PD-1) had encouraging activity and manageable safety (Fukuoka, 2020). This study further assessed the safety and efficacy of this combination. Methods: Patients (pts) from the US aged ≥18 years who progressed on/were intolerant to standard chemotherapy were enrolled. Regorafenib was given orally, once daily in 28-day (D) cycles (21D on/7D off) plus IV nivolumab 480 mg on D1. Regorafenib starting dose was 80 mg; if well tolerated, it could be escalated to 120 mg in Cycle 2. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1); secondary aims included disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety (NCI-CTCAE v5.0 grade). Biomarker analysis was exploratory. Results: 70 pts (59% male) started treatment. At baseline, median age was 57 years (range 34–85), ECOG PS 0/1 was 51%/49%, 67% had liver metastases (mets), and the primary tumor site was right-sided colon in 36% and rectum in 17%. Median number of cycles was 3.0 (range 1–13); 41% of pts escalated regorafenib to 120 mg. Five pts (7.1%) had a partial response (PR) lasting ≥16 weeks (wks) and 22 (31.4%) had stable disease (SD); pts without liver mets had a higher ORR (21.7%). In pts with tumor samples (n = 40), higher baseline expression (IHC) of cytotoxic T cells (CD3+/CD8+/GranzymeB+), Tregs (FoxP3+), and macrophages (CD68+) trended with clinical benefit (PR/SD ≥16 wks/PFS); pts with liver mets had lower expression. Lower plasma levels of biomarkers of vascular biology (e.g. VEGF-D, Ang-2, VWF) trended with longer PFS. Grade (Gr) 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 53% of pts and Gr 4 in 10%. Three pts had a Gr 5 TEAE: n = 1 related to the combination (sepsis); n = 1 related to nivolumab only by investigator (sepsis); n = 1 unrelated to treatment (respiratory failure). Most common Gr 3/4 TEAEs: maculopapular rash (14%), fatigue (7%), pneumonia (6%), increased bilirubin (6%). Conclusions: Combination treatment with regorafenib (up to 120 mg/day) and nivolumab (480 mg every 28D) has manageable safety. Efficacy of this combination in the North American population did not emulate results in the Japanese population. Absence of liver mets and expression of specific biomarkers indicate a better response and may warrant further analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT04126733


No liver mets

n = 23
Liver mets

n = 47
All patients

N = 70
ORR, n (%)
5 (21.7)
0
5 (7.1)
PR, n (%)
5 (21.7)
0
5 (7.1)
SD, n (%)
8 (34.8)
14 (29.8)
22 (31.4)
Progressive disease, n (%)
9 (39.1)
27 (57.4)
36 (51.4)
Not evaluable, n (%)
1 (4.3)
6 (12.8)
7 (10.0)
DCR at 40 wks, n (%)
13 (56.5)
14 (29.8)
27 (38.6)
Median duration of SD, wks
30
21
30
Median PFS, wks
15
8
8
Median OS, wks
52
47
52

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer–Advanced Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04126733

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 3560)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.3560

Abstract #

3560

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures