Background: Myelodysplastic syndrome(MDS) patients may have iron overload due to long-term RBC transfusion or combined with abnormal iron metabolism.what are the differences of iron content detection by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dual energy spectrum computed tomography (DECT)? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods in the state of high and low iron deposition? Can the two methods complement each other? The purpose of this study was to compare the difference of liver/cardiac iron content detection in MDS patients by DECT and MRI under different adjust serum ferritin (ASF) levels. Methods: Liver and cardiac iron content were detected by DECT and MRI. Patients divided into different subgroups according to ASF. Compared the detection rate between DECT and MRI group, and correlation between liver/cardiac iron content detected by DECT/MRI and ASF in each subgroups. Results: The detection rate of iron overload(IO) in DECT group was lower than that of MRI group with ASF < 1000ng/ml subgroup,DECT and MRI had similar detection rates of moderate to severe IO with 1000≤ ASF < 5000ng/ml subgroup, detection rate of severe IO in MRI was lower than that of DECT with 5000ng/ml ≤ ASF subgroup. In patients underwent DECT and MRI examination at the same time, ASF was significantly correlated with hepatic VIC but not with liver iron concentration (LIC), and LIC correlated with ASF after removed these data of ASF > 5000 mg/L. LIC expression are not significantly different among 1000≤ ASF < 5000ng/ml and 5000 ng/ml ≤ASF subgroup. LIC and liver virtual iron content (VIC) were all significant correlation with ASF when ASF < 2500ng/ml, liver VIC was still correlation with ASF but LIC was not when 2500ng/ml≤ ASF. Neither cardiac VIC nor myocardial iron content (MIC) correlation with ASF in these subgroups. Conclusions: This study showed that MRI and DECT can be used complementary to each other. In high iron content, such as ASF ≥5000ng/ml, DECT detection is more reliable. In patients with low iron content, such as SF < 1000 ng/ml, MRI detection is more reliable. According to ASF, the appropriate detection method can be selected to evaluate the iron content more accurately.