Treatment patterns among patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer in the United States.

Authors

null

Eric M. Maiese

GlaxoSmithKline, Navy Yard, PA

Eric M. Maiese , Bruno Émond , Jinan Liu , Marie-Hélène Lafeuille , Patrick Lefebvre , Isabelle Ghelerter , Caterina Wu , Jean Hurteau , Premal H. Thaker

Organizations

GlaxoSmithKline, Navy Yard, PA, Analysis Group, Montreal, QC, Canada, Analysis Group, Menlo Park, CA, GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, MA, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
GlaxoSmithKline

Background: Among patients (pts) with endometrial cancer (EC), response rates for platinum-based regimens in the first-line (1L) setting range from 40% to 62% in clinical trials. This study describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) among pts with advanced/recurrent EC treated with a platinum-based regimen in a real-world setting in the US. Methods: This retrospective study used Optum Clinformatics Extended Data Mart de-identified databases from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2019. Adult pts with advanced/recurrent EC who initiated a 1L platinum-based regimen and subsequently initiated second-line (2L) antineoplastic therapy were identified. Prior to initiation of 1L, a 12-month washout period of continuous enrollment without use of antineoplastic agents (except hormonal agents) was imposed. Kaplan-Meier (KM) rates were used to report TTNT and OS from 2L, third line (3L), and fourth line (4L), separately. Results: A total of 1878 pts with advanced/recurrent EC initiated 2L therapy following a platinum-based regimen in 1L. Among them, 739 (39.4%) pts initiated 3L and 330 (17.6%) initiated 4L or later (4L+) therapy. Median pt age was 68.0 years. More pts received platinum-based regimens (56.4%) in 2L than other options (Table). Few pts (3.3%) received immunotherapy. Among pts receiving 3L, a similar percentage of pts were treated with platinum-based (33.2%) and other chemotherapy regimens (33.8%); few pts received immunotherapy (3.0%). Among pts receiving 4L+, the most frequent treatment option was other chemotherapy (46.1%). Median TTNT was 17.7, 10.6, and 8.4 months for 2L, 3L, and 4L pts, respectively. KM rates of OS following initiation of 2L therapy at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 68.4%, 49.6%, 41.3%, and 33.6%, respectively, with a median OS of 23.5 months. Conclusions: Among pts with advanced/recurrent EC treated with platinum-based therapy in 1L, platinum-based regimens remain prevalent treatment choices in later lines of therapy. In this study, immunotherapy was used infrequently in 2L, 3L, and 4L+. The median TTNT decreased in later lines of therapy. This study highlights a critical need for novel, more effective treatment options in later lines of therapy to optimize outcomes among pts with advanced/recurrent EC.


1L

n=1878
2L

n=1878
3L

n=739
4L+

n=330
Duration of treatment, mean ± StDev (median), months
4.5±3.0 (4.4)
4.1±4.0

(3.1)
4.5±4.8 (3.2)
3.8±3.2

(3.1)
Duration of treatment-free interval, mean ± StDev (median), months
8.0±13.3

(3.5)
10.0±19.5 (2.1)
4.0±10.6 (0.5)
2.8±8.1

(0.4)
Treatment option, %

Platinum-based regimen

Other chemotherapy

Targeted therapy

NCCN-recommended immunotherapy

Other immunotherapy


100










56.4

21.8

9.6

3.1

0.2


33.2

33.8

17.1

2.7

0.3


31.5

46.1

32.4

7.9


Median TTNT, months

17.7
10.6
8.4

NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network; StDev, standard deviation.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Real-World Data/Outcomes

Clinical Trial Registration Number

213577

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr e18693)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e18693

Abstract #

e18693

Abstract Disclosures