Real-world prevalence of homologous recombination repair gene (BRCA1/2 and ATM) mutations (HRRm) in patients (pts) with advanced prostate cancer (aPC) as detected by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA).

Authors

null

Nicolas Sayegh

Huntsman Cancer Institute - University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT

Nicolas Sayegh , Umang Swami , Pedro C. Barata , Michael B. Lilly , Roberto Nussenzveig , Chuck Hensel , Alan Haruo Bryce , Mehmet Asim Bilen , Elisabeth I. Heath , Lakshminarayanan Nandagopal , Rohan Garje , Philip James Saylor , Hani M. Babiker , Daniel A. Vaena , Manish Kohli , Sumanta K. Pal , A. Oliver Sartor , Neeraj Agarwal

Organizations

Huntsman Cancer Institute - University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, Guardant Health, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Hoover, AL, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, The University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, Tulane Cancer Center, New Orleans, LA, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: PARP inhibitors, olaparib and rucaparib recently improved survival outcomes (in the Profound and Triton-2 trials) in pts with aPC harboring HRRm. Notably, ~35% of pts screened for the PROfound trial did not meet eligibility solely due to the lack of adequate quality/quantity of tumor tissue required for CGP (De Bono, NEJM, 2020). cfDNA analysis non-invasively assesses tumor-derived genomic alterations. We evaluated the prevalence of HRRm in a real-world aPC population, who had commercially available cfDNA assay results available. Methods: cfDNA based CGP (using a clinically-validated 73- to 74-gene panel i.e. Guardant360 or G360) from consecutive aPC pts between 11/2016–8/2020 were used for detection of HRRm. Frameshift and nonsense mutations were included as pathogenic. Variants of unknown significance were excluded. In this unmatched study, the prevalence of each HRRm was compared with those reported in literature using the chi square test. Results: cfDNA CGP from 7701 aPC pts were available for interrogation of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, & from 4671 aPC pts for ATM mutations. Prevalence of BRCA1 and 2 as detected by cfDNA was similar to historical CGP of primary tissue. Prevalence of BRCA1 was higher than historical CGP of metastatic tissue. Prevalence of ATM in cfDNA was higher than historic tumor tissue CGP but similar to prior reports from cfDNA testing (Table). Conclusions: In this large real-world population of pts with aPC undergoing routine cfDNA CGP by a CLIA certified lab, prevalence of HRRm was similar (or higher for BRCA1 and ATM) to what has been previously reported from the tumor tissue. These data provide the rationale for utilizing cfDNA CGP as a routine test for detection of HRRm in men with aPC to identify men who are candidates for PARPi.

Prevalence of HRRm in the current cfDNA CGP cohort (Sayegh et al) compared with the prevalence described in literature.

GeneStudySamplePrevalence (%)95% Confidence IntervalPt nump-value
BRCA1SayeghcfDNA4.06[3.62-4.50]7707N/A
BRCA1Chungmetastatic tissue1.32[0.80-2.12]1816<0.001
BRCA1Mateoprimary tissue1.71[0.00-3.64]1750.118
BRCA2SayeghcfDNA7.97[7.36-8.57]7707N/A
BRCA2Chungmetastatic tissue10.90[9.47-12.33]1816<0.001
BRCA2Mateoprimary tissue8[3.98-12.02]1750.987
BRCA2KohlicfDNA8[4.64-11.36]2500.985
ATMSayeghcfDNA19.87[18.72-21.01]4671N/A
ATMKohlicfDNA15[10.57-19.43]2500.059

PMID: Chung et al - 31218271, Mateo et al - 31874108, Kohli et al - 32268276

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session: Prostate Cancer - Localized Disease

Track

Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Tumor Biology, Biomarkers, and Pathology

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 6; abstr 256)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.6_suppl.256

Abstract #

256

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures