Circulating tumor DNA analysis for assessment of recurrence risk, benefit of adjuvant therapy, and early relapse detection after treatment in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors

null

Tenna V Henriksen

Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Tenna V Henriksen , Noelia Tarazona , Thomas Reinert , Juan Antonio Carbonell-Asins , Derrick Renner , Shruti Sharma , Desamparados Roda , Marisol Huerta , Susana Roselló , Kåre Andersson Gotschalck , Anders Husted Madsen , Per Vadgaard Andersen , Ole Thorlacius-Ussing , Uffe S. Løve , Himanshu Sethi , Alexey Aleshin , Andres Cervantes , Claus Lindbjerg Andersen , Lene H. Iversen

Organizations

Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain, Natera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain, Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Randers, Randers, Denmark, Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Herning, Herning, Denmark, Department of Surgery A, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark, Department of Surgery, Regionshospitalet Viborg, Viborg, Denmark, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Research Funding

Other
The Danish Council for Independent Research, The Novo Nordisk Foundation, The Danish Cancer Society, and Natera, Inc

Background: Timely detection of recurrence, as well as identification of patients at high risk of recurrence after surgery and after completion of adjuvant therapy, are major challenges in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Postsurgical circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is a promising tool for the identification of patients with minimal residual disease (MRD) and a high risk of recurrence. The objective of this prospective, multicenter study was to determine whether serial postsurgical ctDNA analysis could identify the patients at high risk of recurrence, provide an assessment of adjuvant therapy efficacy and detect relapse earlier than standard-of-care radiological imaging. Methods: The cohort comprises 265 stage I-III CRC patients, the to-date largest cohort assessed for ctDNA. All patients had the tumor resected and a subset of 62.6% (166 /265) was additionally treated with ACT. Plasma samples (n = 1503) were collected at various time points for a median follow-up of 28.4 months (range: 1.2-51.0 months). Individual tumors and matched germline DNA were whole-exome sequenced and somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were identified. Personalized multiplex PCR assays were designed to track tumor-specific SNVs (Signatera, bespoke mPCR NGS assay) in each patient’s plasma sample. Results: Postoperative ctDNA status prior to ACT was assessed in 218 patients, of which 9.17% (20/218) were identified to be MRD-positive and 75% (15/20) eventually relapsed. The remaining 25% (5/20) of MRD-positive patients that did not relapse, received ACT. In contrast, only 13.6% (27/198) of MRD-negative cases relapsed (HR: 11: 95% CI: 5.7-20; p < 0.001). Longitudinal ctDNA-positive status, post-definitive therapy (n = 202) was associated with a HR of 36 (95% CI: 16-81; p < 0.001). For a subset of 155 patients postoperative CEA and ctDNA measurements were compared, wherein, ctDNA-positive status was found to be significantly associated with RFS (HR, 7.1; 95% CI, 3.4-15; P < 0.001) compared to CEA (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.46-3.1; P = 0.73). Serial ctDNA analysis detected MRD up to a median of 8 months (0.56 - 21.6 months) ahead of radiologic relapse. Conclusion: Postoperative ctDNA positive status was associated with markedly reduced RFS compared to CEA. The study also shows that effective therapy can be curative in a portion of MRD-positive patients. In a longitudinal setting, ctDNA analysis predicted the risk of recurrence and is a more reliable biomarker for treatment response monitoring.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Oral Abstract Session: Anal and Colorectal Cancer

Track

Colorectal Cancer,Anal Cancer

Sub Track

Diagnostics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 3; abstr 11)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.3_suppl.11

Abstract #

11

Abstract Disclosures