Efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib (A + Ax) versus sunitinib (S) by number of IMDC risk factors and tumor sites at baseline in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Extended follow-up results from JAVELIN Renal 101.

Authors

null

Yoshihiko Tomita

Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan

Yoshihiko Tomita , Robert J. Motzer , Toni K. Choueiri , Brian I. Rini , Hideaki Miyake , Mototsugu Oya , Laurence Albiges , Yosuke Fujii , Yoshiko Umeyama , Jing Wang , Alessandra Di Pietro , Manuela Schmidinger

Organizations

Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Pfizer R&D Japan, Tokyo, Japan, Pfizer Inc., Cambridge, MA, Pfizer SRL, Milan, Italy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Pfizer, as part of an alliance between Pfizer and Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Background: In the phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006), A + Ax demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) benefit across IMDC risk groups (favorable, intermediate, and poor) vs S in patients with previously untreated aRCC. Here we report efficacy of A + Ax vs S by number of IMDC risk factors (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4-6) and target tumor sites (1, 2, 3, and ≥4) at baseline from the second interim analysis of overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive A 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 wk + Ax 5 mg orally twice daily or S 50 mg orally once daily for 4 wk (6-wk cycle). PFS and ORR per independent central review (RECIST 1.1) and OS were assessed. Results: At data cut-off (Jan 2019), median (m) follow-up for OS and PFS was 19.3 vs 19.2 mo and 16.8 vs 15.2 mo for the A + Ax vs S arm, respectively. The table shows OS, PFS, and ORR by number of IMDC risk factors and target tumor sites at baseline. A + Ax generally demonstrated efficacy benefit vs S across subgroups. Conclusions: With extended follow-up, A + Ax generally demonstrated efficacy benefit vs S across the number of IMDC risk factors and tumor sites at baseline in aRCC. OS was still immature; follow-up for the final analysis is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02684006.

n
A + Ax (N=442)
n
S (N=444)
mOS
(95% CI), mo
A + Ax (N=442)
mOS
(95% CI), mo
S (N=444)
OS Unstratified HR
(95% CI)
(A + Ax vs S)
mPFS
(95% CI), mo
A + Ax (N=442)
mPFS
(95% CI), mo
S (N=444)
PFS Unstratified HR
(95% CI)
(A + Ax vs S)
ORR
(95% CI), %
A + Ax (N=442)
ORR
(95% CI), %
S (N=444)
No. of IMDC risk factors
09496NE (NE, NE)NE (NE, NE)0.812 (0.336, 1.960)24.0 (20.7, NE)16.7 (12.6, NE)0.626 (0.397, 0.986)67.0 (56.6, 76.4)39.6 (29.7, 50.1)
115715430.0 (30.0, NE)28.6 (26.2, NE)0.740 (0.468, 1.171)11.1 (8.5, 15.2)9.4 (6.9, 11.2)0.822 (0.608, 1.111)57.3 (49.2, 65.2)27.9 (21.0, 35.7)
2114122NE (24.6, NE)NE (NE, NE)1.044 (0.640, 1.705)13.8 (7.0, 23.6)8.2 (5.2, 9.8)0.676 (0.478, 0.954)47.4 (37.9, 56.9)25.4 (18.0, 34.1)
3434325.3 (14.7, NE)16.5 (9.9, 23.0)0.693 (0.375, 1.279)6.7 (2.8, 13.9)5.5 (2.8, 6.5)0.515 (0.298, 0.889)30.2 (17.2, 46.1)11.6 (3.9, 25.1)
4-6292819.9 (9.6, NE)7.8 (4.2, 13.2)0.349 (0.169, 0.720)5.6 (1.8, 9.0)2.7 (1.4, 3.1)0.471 (0.251, 0.885)34.5 (17.9, 54.3)14.3 (4.0, 32.7)
No. of target tumor sites at baseline
117817830.0 (30.0, NE)NE (28.6, NE)0.598 (0.354, 1.010)16.1 (11.6, NE)9.1 (6.9, 13.8)0.670 (0.499, 0.902)63.5 (56.0, 70.6)30.3 (23.7, 37.7)
2150152NE (24.4, NE)27.4 (25.5, NE)1.023 (0.672, 1.558)12.5 (8.3, 18.0)9.5 (6.9, 11.5)0.769 (0.567, 1.043)50.0 (41.7, 58.3)29.6 (22.5, 37.5)
3697622.5 (17.7, NE)18.9 (13.0, NE)0.788 (0.485, 1.282)9.7 (5.7, 15.2)5.6 (2.8, 6.7)0.646 (0.426, 0.980)42.0 (30.2, 54.5)23.7 (14.7, 34.8)
≥4352425.5 (21.2, NE)7.8 (5.4, NE)0.344 (0.139, 0.799)6.8 (2.7, NE)2.8 (1.6, 5.8)0.516 (0.266, 1.000)37.1 (21.5, 55.1)12.5 (2.7, 32.4)

NE, not estimable.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02684006

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 6; abstr 302)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.6_suppl.302

Abstract #

302

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures