Tumor bulk as a prognostic biomarker and predictor of benefit from anti-EGFR therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis of 476 patients from the ARCAD Clinical Trials Program.

Authors

Benjamin Weinberg

Benjamin Adam Weinberg

Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Benjamin Adam Weinberg , Manel Rakez , Benoist Chibaudel , Tim Maughan , Richard Adams , John Raymond Zalcberg , Axel Grothey , Takayuki Yoshino , Qian Shi , Aimery De Gramont , Dustin A. Deming

Organizations

Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, Statistical Unit, ARCAD Foundation, Levallois-Perret, France, Franco-British Institute, Levallois-Perret, France, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, United Kingdom, Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, West Cancer Center, OneOncology, Germantown, TN, Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Primary tumor sidedness has emerged as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Tumor bulk has also been postulated to predict response to anti-EGFR therapy. We sought to evaluate the role of tumor bulk as a predictive biomarker to anti-EGFR therapy in pts with left- (LS) and right-sided (RS) mCRC. Methods: Data from 476 pts with mCRC enrolled across 2 first-line trials of anti-EGFR plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy were pooled. Pts were included if there was available information on tumor sidedness and tumor bulk. All were KRAS wild-type and BRAF wild-type or unknown BRAF status. The right colon was defined as the cecum through the transverse colon, and the left colon as the splenic flexure through the rectum. Tumor bulk was the mean tumor size of target lesions at baseline, bulky defined as > 3.5 cm. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models adjusting for performance status (PS), platelet count, primary tumor (PT) resection, number of metastatic sites, and stratified by study. Results: Pts with bulky tumors (211, 44%) had higher PS, white blood cell and platelet counts, higher CEA, fewer sites of metastatic disease, more liver than lung metastases, and fewer had PT resection. OS and PFS medians in months (mos) are presented in the table with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). Bulky tumors had inferior median OS compared with non-bulky (mOS, 17.9 vs. 21.3 mos, HRadj 1.33, 95% CI 1.05-1.69, P = 0.016) although median PFS was similar (mPFS, 8.6 vs. 8.7 mos, HRadj 1.15, 95% CI 0.92-1.42, P = 0.21). Conclusions: Tumor bulk is an independent prognostic factor for OS in KRAS wild-type and BRAF wild-type or unknown BRAF status pts. Pts with non-bulky RS tumors have survival outcomes similar to pts with bulky LS tumors. Although the mPFS for pts with RS tumors treated with anti-EGFR therapy was the lowest across subgroups, this finding was not statistically significant. Further research is warranted into whether pts with bulky RS tumors benefit from anti-EGFR therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT00182715, NCT00640081

mPFS (95%CI)
mOS (95%CI)
w/o anti-EGFRw/ anti-EGFRallw/o anti-EGFRw/ anti-EGFRall
LS bulky
(N = 148)
9.0 (8.4-10.5)8.9 (6.5-10.2)8.9 (8.1-9.8)19.4 (15.9-22.5)17.4 (15.6-24.6)18.3 (16.6-21.2)*
RS bulky
(N = 63)
8.0 (4.3-11.1)6.1 (5.4-9.4)7.4 (5.8-9.2)13.5 (9.8-24.1)13.0 (8.8-26.1)13.4 (9.8-20.7)
LS non-bulky
(N = 192)
9.2 (8.4-11.3)8.7 (8.3-10.8)8.9 (8.4-10.6)23.0 (20.7-28.3)22.1 (17.8-27.0)22.4 (20.3-26.7)*
RS non-bulky
(N = 73)
8.1 (6.6-10.3)7.8 (7.0-10.5)8.1 (7.1-9.0)18.6 (13.2-31.4)18.3 (10.1-25.1)18.6 (13.8-24.8)

*Padj 0.05.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session: Colorectal Cancer

Track

Colorectal Cancer

Sub Track

Tumor Biology, Biomarkers, and Pathology

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00182715, NCT00640081

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 3; abstr 108)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.3_suppl.108

Abstract #

108

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2022 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

The prevalence of common KRAS variants and associated outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

First Author: Laura W. Musselwhite

First Author: Chirag Patel

First Author: Toshiharu Hirose