Final results from ClarIDHy, a global, phase III, randomized, double-blind study of ivosidenib (IVO) versus placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with previously treated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and an isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation.

Authors

null

Andrew X. Zhu

Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA

Andrew X. Zhu , Teresa Macarulla , Milind M. Javle , Robin Kate Kelley , Sam Joseph Lubner , Jorge Adeva , James M. Cleary , Daniel V.T. Catenacci , Mitesh J. Borad , John A. Bridgewater , William Proctor Harris , Adrian Gerard Murphy , Do-Youn Oh , Jonathan R. Whisenant , Bin Wu , Liewen Jiang , Camelia Gliser , Shuchi Sumant Pandya , Juan W. Valle , Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa

Organizations

Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, Dana-Faber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Gastrointestinal Oncology Program, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Utah Cancer Specialists, Murray, UT, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center & Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Background: CCA is a rare cancer for which there are limited effective therapies. IDH1 mutations occur in ~20% of intrahepatic CCAs, resulting in production of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate, which promotes oncogenesis. IVO (AG-120) is a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1). ClarIDHy aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of IVO vs PBO in pts with unresectable or metastatic mIDH1 CCA. The primary endpoint was met with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiology center (IRC) with IVO vs PBO (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, p < 0.0001). Objective response rate (ORR) and stable disease for IVO were 2.4% (3 partial responses) and 50.8% (n = 63) vs 0% and 27.9% (n = 17) for PBO. IVO pts experienced significantly less decline in physical and emotional functioning domains of quality of life at cycle 2 day 1 vs PBO pts (nominal p < 0.05). Methods: Pts with mIDH1 CCA were randomized 2:1 to IVO (500 mg PO QD) or matched PBO and stratified by prior systemic therapies (1 or 2). Key eligibility: unresectable or metastatic mIDH1 CCA based on central testing; ECOG PS 0–1; measurable disease (RECIST v1.1). Crossover from PBO to IVO was permitted at radiographic progression. Primary endpoint: PFS by IRC. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS; by intent-to-treat), ORR, PFS (by investigator), safety, and quality of life. The planned crossover-adjusted OS was derived using the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) model. Results: As of 31 May 2020, ~780 pts were prescreened for an IDH1 mutation and 187 were randomized to IVO (n = 126) or PBO (n = 61); 13 remain on IVO. Median age 62 y; M/F 68/119; 91% intrahepatic CCA; 93% metastatic disease; 47% had 2 prior therapies. 70% of PBO pts crossed over to IVO. OS data were mature, with 79% OS events in IVO arm and 82% in PBO. Median OS (mOS) was 10.3 months for IVO and 7.5 months for PBO (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.56–1.12; one-sided p = 0.093). The RPSFT-adjusted mOS was 5.1 months for PBO (HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34–0.70; p < 0.0001). Common all-grade treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs, ≥ 15%) in the IVO arm: nausea 41%, diarrhea 35%, fatigue 31%, cough 25%, abdominal pain 24%, decreased appetite 24%, ascites 23%, vomiting 23%, anemia 18%, and constipation 15%. Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported in 50% of IVO pts vs 37% of PBO pts, with grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs in 7% of IVO pts vs 0% in PBO. 7% of IVO pts experienced an AE leading to treatment discontinuation vs 9% of PBO pts. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: IVO was well tolerated and resulted in a favorable OS trend vs PBO despite a high rate of crossover. These data – coupled with statistical improvement in PFS, supportive quality of life data, and favorable safety profile – demonstrate the clinical benefit of IVO in advanced mIDH1 CCA. Clinical trial information: NCT02989857

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Oral Abstract Session: Hepatobiliary Cancer, Neuroendocrine/Carcinoid, Pancreatic Cancer, and Small Bowel Cancer

Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer,Neuroendocrine/Carcinoid,Pancreatic Cancer,Small Bowel Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02989857

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 3; abstr 266)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.3_suppl.266

Abstract #

266

Abstract Disclosures