The optimal living and survivorship program: Piloting a novel survivorship care model.

Authors

null

Stacie Corcoran

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Stacie Corcoran, John Russell, Jill Clayton, Bridget Kelly, Andrea Smith, Kate Keenan, Mark E. Robson, Neil M. Iyengar

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, MSKCC, New York, NY, Memor Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Multiple agencies define cancer survivorship as beginning at the time of diagnosis. However, traditional care models deliver “survivorship care” months or years after diagnosis, which can cause care disruption and “transition anxiety”. We hypothesized that an approach centered around wellbeing could be applied across the cancer continuum (starting at diagnosis) and serve as a novel survivorship care model. Methods: We developed the Optimal Living and Survivorship Program with 3 key components: 1) a centralized model that provides multidisciplinary care; 2) an individualized Wellness Plan (WP); and 3) enrollment at the time of diagnosis to mitigate post-treatment transition. Participants complete a digital wellness questionnaire (WQ) prior to the 1st medical oncology consult, receive a validated algorithm-based WP, and meet with a Wellness Advanced Practice Provider (WAPP). The WP consists of individualized education and referrals (e.g., nutrition, exercise, financial counseling). The WAPP will assume post-treatment (“survivorship”) care. We piloted this approach in patients diagnosed with breast cancer beginning in 11/19. The primary outcome is feasibility defined by completion of the WQ. Secondary outcomes include participation in the WAPP visits, attendance at appointments, and quality of life (QOL). Results: Due to COVID-19, the pilot was paused in 2/20. Data collected from 11/19 through 2/20 reveal a total of 67 eligible patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were approached, with 65 enrolled. All participants completed the WQ and all received a WP with supportive referrals and educational resources. All participants engaged with WP recommendations. Participants were screened at high risk for an average of 3.8 unmet needs, and 98% were at high risk for 2 or more needs at time of diagnosis. Exercise was the highest unmet need (83%). There was 76% adherence with referral to the program’s Exercise Physiologist. Other areas of needs were nutrition (59%) and sleep quality (51%). WAPP tele-visits began in 6/20; visit completion rates will be presented. Qualitative data regarding patient experience and QOL will be obtained via interviews and feedback will be categorized in thematic domains. Conclusions: Most patients enrolled in the program, completed a WQ and engaged with the WP. Our findings suggest that this early intro to survivorship is feasible. Earlier engagement and incorporation of wellness and supportive services from time of diagnosis may improve our ability to address multifactorial needs during and after cancer therapy.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

On-Demand Poster Session: Cost, Value, and Policy

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy

Sub Track

Value-Based Models of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 29; abstr 40)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.29_suppl.40

Abstract #

40

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Eleonora Teplinsky

First Author: J. Vozmediano

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Patient experience with breast cancer care delivered in a multidisciplinary clinic.

First Author: Stephanie L. Graff

First Author: Megan A Mullins