Improving the referral rate of universal genetic counseling for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center: A quality improvement project.

Authors

null

Kanika G. Nair

George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC

Kanika G. Nair, Brandie Leach, Selina Sledge, Megan Kilbane, Jennifer Bates, Meghan O'Brien, Bassam N. Estfan, Alok A. Khorana, Pauline Funchain

Organizations

George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, Cleveland Clinic-Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: While most PDAC are sporadic, up to 10% are inherited. In 2018, ASCO and NCCN guidelines were updated to recommend that all patients with PDAC be considered for genetic counseling (GC) and germline testing. Furthermore, interest in treating patients with targeted therapy, such as olaparib, for germline mutations is increasing. We implemented a quality improvement project to identify the referral rate to GC for patients with PDAC, with the goal of improving the referral rate to 60%. Methods: Barriers to GC referral were identified using quality improvement tools developed at the ASCO Quality Training Program. Three “plan, do, study, act” (PDSA) cycles were implemented: 1) updating the electronic order and tumor board template to include GC recommendation (Aug–Oct 2019), 2) physician education (Nov–Dec 2019) and 3) patient education and physician reinforcement (Jan–Feb 2020). Baseline data to evaluate impact of PDSA intervention (from April to June 2019) on documented discussions about GC and placement of the referral order was completed via chart review. Results: Between April 2019 to January 2020, 199 patients with PDAC were seen in medical oncology clinic as new patient visits. Thirteen patients had previously completed GC. For the remainder, baseline discussion and referral rates were 25% and 9%, respectively. Discussion and referral rates improved to 55% and 30% after PDSA 1, to 73% and 33% after PDSA 2, and to 95% and 58% after PDSA 3, respectively. Forty-nine patients were referred at the first visit and 23 were referred at a subsequent visit. Forty-six patients underwent GC. In patients who completed germline testing 8.9% (4/45) were found to have a pathogenic variant in BRCA2, TP53, ATM, and MUTYH. Conclusions: With increased physician and patient education, we were able to improve the GC discussion rate from 25% to 95% and referral rate from 9% to 58%. While we did not meet our aim of 60% GC referral rate, we identified obstacles and outlined an improved process for early GC referrals. Enacting processes to reinforce GC referrals for patients with PDAC is likely to increase detection of germline mutations in this population.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

On-Demand Poster Session: Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science

Track

Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science

Sub Track

Application of Quality Improvement Tools

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 29; abstr 196)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.29_suppl.196

Abstract #

196

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts