Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim-sndz as primary prophylaxis (PP) versus secondary prophylaxis (SP) to prevent chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in breast cancer patients at intermediate risk.

Authors

Edward Li

Edward C. Li

Sandoz, Princeton, NJ

Edward C. Li, Dylan Mezzio, Kimberley J. Campbell, Andrew Spargo, Gary H. Lyman

Organizations

Sandoz, Princeton, NJ, Xcenda, Palm Harbor, FL, Sandoz Inc, Tucson, AZ, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

Research Funding

Other
This study was designed and conducted by Xcenda, in collaboration with the Sponsor, Sandoz Inc.

Background: According to clinical practice guidelines, the threshold for routine myeloid growth factor (MGF) PP is a high risk (>20%) of developing FN. However, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a recent recommendation expands this threshold for using MGF PP to include patients at intermediate risk (10-20%) of developing FN, with the goal of reducing emergency room and hospital visits. Patients with breast cancer receiving potentially curative chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel or paclitaxel (every 21 days) are at an intermediate risk (10-20%) of developing FN. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of PP vs. SP using a biosimilar MGF, filgrastim-sndz, in early-stage breast cancer patients at intermediate risk of FN. Methods: A Markov model with a lifetime horizon was constructed to evaluate the total costs and clinical outcomes when using filgrastim-sndz as PP vs. SP in 56 year old early-stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel (following doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Patients had ≥1 FN risk factor (i.e., recent surgery) without the receipt of anti-HER2 therapy, representing a 16% baseline FN risk. Average Sales Price (ASP) calculated from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services July 2020 ASP Drug Pricing File was used as the filgrastim-sndz cost. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for cost per FN event avoided, life-year saved (LYS), and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained from a United States payer perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted. Results: Filgrastim-sndz as PP vs. SP provided an additional 0.102 FN events avoided, 0.065 LYS, and 0.056 QALYs at an incremental cost of $2,106. The ICERs were $20,656, $32,624 and $37,333 for cost per FN event avoided, cost per LYS, and cost per QALY gained, respectively. In the PSA, the likelihood of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained was 71.3%. Conclusions: For early-stage breast cancer patients at intermediate risk of FN receiving adjuvant docetaxel with 1 or more risk factors, PP with filgrastim-sndz compared to SP is cost-effective based on a WTP threshold of $50,000/QALY.

PP (comparator) vs. SP (reference) using filgrastim-sndz.

∆ Costs∆ FNs Avoided∆ LYs∆ QALYsIncremental $/FN Event AvoidedIncremental $/LYSIncremental $/QALY Gained
$2,1060.1020.0650.056$20,656$32,624$37,333

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

On-Demand Poster Session: Cost, Value, and Policy

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 29; abstr 73)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.29_suppl.73

Abstract #

73

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures