Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Thomas William LeBlanc, Arpamas Seetasith, Michelle E Choi, Andy Surinach, Tu My To, Melissa Montez, Esprit Ma
Background: Limited data are available on the economic burden of care for older patients with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and total cost of care (TCC) in this population. Methods: A retrospective observational study of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data (Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2015) linked to Medicare claims (up to Dec 31, 2017). Patients were ≥ 60 years old; newly diagnosed with AML; had ≥ 12 months of continuous Part A and B coverage before diagnosis; and initiated treatment on a hypomethylating agent: azacytidine (AZA) or decitabine (DEC) ≤ 90 days after diagnosis, or best supportive care (BSC). HRU (hospitalization, monitoring, transfusions, office visits, emergency department [ED] visits) and TCC reported in per patient per month (PPPM) were evaluated. Results: Among 3,905 patients identified, 877 (22%) received AZA, 899 (23%) received DEC, 2,129 (55%) received BSC. At a mean follow-up of 4.1 month (mo), mean TCC in BSC was $22,479.48 PPPM (standard deviation [SD]: $20,183.72). Hospitalization was the main cost driver (83.7% of TCC) in BSC, followed by Part B services and transfusions. At a mean follow-up of 11.9 vs. 13.0 mo, and mean treatment duration both at 5.4 mo, the mean TCC was $15,805.76 PPPM (SD: $19,368.16) in AZA vs. $20,518.71 PPPM (SD: $23,400.68) in DEC. All HRU decreased after AZA or DEC treatment initiation, except an increase in hospitalizations after treatment discontinuation (Table). During treatment on AZA and DEC, the main cost driver was hospitalization (60.7% vs. 60.9%) followed by drug costs and transfusions. After treatment discontinuation, hospitalization remained the main cost driver (77.2% vs. 78.9%) followed by transfusions and Part B services. Conclusions: This study quantifies the sizeable TCC in older patients with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy with hospitalization as the primary cost driver. Novel treatments that reduce hospitalizations, transfusions, and Part B services could lower the burden to the overall healthcare system.
Mean PPPM | During AZA treatment (n=877) | Post-AZA treatment (n=601) | During DEC treatment (n=899) | Post-DEC treatment (n=685) | BSC (n=2129) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hospitalization | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.94 |
Monitoring | 5.73 | 3.02 | 6.64 | 3.89 | 2.25 |
Red blood cell transfusion | 1.00 | 0.70 | 1.10 | 0.70 | 1.00 |
Platelet transfusion | 0.70 | 0.55 | 0.83 | 0.56 | 0.47 |
Office visits | 3.31 | 1.71 | 3.57 | 2.04 | 1.15 |
ED visits | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 1.27 |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Heidi D. Klepin
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Farhad Ravandi
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Claudia Bordignon
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Giovanni Trovato