Better treatment at what cost? A study of myeloma spending.

Authors

null

Rohini Naipaul

Provincial Drug Reimbursement Programs, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada

Rohini Naipaul, Elena Mow, Rebecca Mercer, Lyndee Yeung, Scott Gavura, C. Tom Kouroukis

Organizations

Provincial Drug Reimbursement Programs, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada, Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, ON, Canada, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada, Provincial Drug Reimbursement Programs, Ontario Health(Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Multiple myeloma represents less than 1.5% of new cancer cases in Canada. Currently, the estimated median overall survival is at least 5-6 years, primarily driven by therapeutic advances over the past decade. As treatment protocols routinely use doublet and triplet combinations, there are increasing concerns about the ability of health systems to afford growing costs of treatment. To inform system planning in Ontario, we examined trends in costs and utilization of myeloma drugs funded by Ontario’s New Drug Funding Program (NDFP) and the Ontario Drug Benefit program (ODB). Methods: NDFP primarily funds IV cancer drugs while ODB funds take-home cancer drugs (THCD). Treatment volumes and government costs, including drug costs and pharmacy fees where applicable, were obtained from ODB and NDFP claims data. Based on the available data, trends were examined from the 2010/11 to the second quarter of the 2019/20 fiscal year. Results: A total of 7 myeloma drugs (3-IV cancer drugs, 4-THCD) were examined. Over 9 years (2010/11 - 2018/19), spending on publicly-funded myeloma drugs increased by 303% while treatment volumes increased by 116%. Between 2014/15 and 2018/19, bortezomib spending decreased by 72%, largely due to generic pricing policies, while lenalidomide spending increased by 158%, likely due to new indications. By 2018/19, these 7 drugs accounted for 17% of the total cancer drug costs under Ontario's publicly funded programs. NDFP spending on IV cancer drugs by the second quarter of 2019/20 has surpassed the annual expenditures in 2018/19 due to the addition of daratumumab. Conclusions: Since 2010/11, growth in Ontario's public expenditures on myeloma drugs has outpaced savings from pricing policies and this growth is mainly driven by the high cost of the novel agents.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

On-Demand Poster Session: Cost, Value, and Policy

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 29; abstr 60)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.29_suppl.60

Abstract #

60

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures