Caregiver-oncologist concordance in patient prognosis, caregiver depression, and caregiver mastery.

Authors

Kah Poh Loh

Kah Poh Loh

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

Kah Poh Loh, Eva Culakova, Huiwen Xu, Sindhuja M Kadambi, Allison Magnuson, Marie Anne Flannery, Paul Duberstein, Ronald M. Epstein, Colin McHugh, Ryan David Nipp, Kelly Marie Trevino, Chandrika Sanapala, Beverly Canin, Arlene Angela Gayle, Alison Katherine Conlin, James Bearden, Supriya Gupta Mohile

Organizations

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, Wisconsin NCORP, Marshfield, WI, Pacific Cancer Research Consortium NCORP, Portland, OR, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium (SCOR), Winston-Salem, NC

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Background: Caregivers of older adults with advanced cancer often have a different understanding of the patient’s prognosis compared with their oncologist. Among patients, accurate prognostic awareness is associated with greater depressive symptoms, except when patients utilize more adaptive coping skills. We examined the relationship between caregiver-oncologist prognostic concordance and caregiver depressive symptoms and explored whether this relationship differed by caregiver mastery, the capacity to cope, adjust, and adapt to problems. Methods: We utilized data from a national geriatric assessment cluster-randomized trial (URCC 13070: PI Mohile) that recruited patients aged ≥70 with incurable cancer considering any line of cancer treatment at community oncology practices, their caregivers, and oncologists. At enrollment, caregivers and oncologists estimated the patient’s prognosis (0-6 months, 7-12 months, 1-2 years, 2-5 years, > 5 years); same response was considered concordant. Caregivers completed Ryff’s mastery subscale (range 7-35, higher is better) at enrollment and depression screen (the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2 (range 0-6) 4-6 weeks later. To assess the association of prognostic concordance with caregiver depressive symptoms, we used generalized estimating equations in models adjusted for cancer type, study arm, practice sites, and caregiver demographics. We then assessed moderation effect of caregiver mastery on this association. Results: Among 410 caregiver-oncologist dyads, mean caregiver age was 66.5, 75% were female, and 26% were caregivers of patients with lung cancer. Mean mastery score at enrollment was 27.6 (SD 4.7) and 19% screened positive on PHQ-2 at week 4-6. Among dyads who provided response (N = 370), 28% were concordant. Prognostic concordance was associated with higher caregiver depressive symptoms (β = 0.30; p = 0.04). Significant moderation effect was found between concordance and mastery for caregiver depressive symptoms (p = 0.02). Among caregivers with low mastery ( < median), prognostic concordance was associated with higher depressive symptoms (β = 0.68; p = 0.003). Among caregivers with high mastery (≥median), concordance was not associated with depressive symptoms (β = -0.06; p = 0.67). Conclusions: There is a need to study how prognostic understanding might lead to depression in at-risk caregivers. Interventions targeting caregiver prognostic understanding need to consider its relationship with depressive symptoms, while seeking to increase caregiver mastery.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Highlights Session

Session Title

Poster Highlights C: Approaches to Accessing Patient and Caregiver Perspectives During Cancer Care

Track

Patient Experience,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Cost, Value, and Policy,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities,Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science

Sub Track

Caregiver Burden and Support

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 29; abstr 143)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.29_suppl.143

Abstract #

143

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Improved germline screening for patients with pancreatic cancer through provider driven testing.

First Author: Heather Frazier

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Trends in colorectal cancer screening from NHIS survey: Analysis of modalities impact on overall screening.

First Author: Derek W. Ebner

First Author: Alycia R Foti