Incidence of PI3K pathway alteration and response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes.

Authors

Reva Basho

Reva K Basho

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Houston, TX

Reva K Basho , Clinton Yam , Jason B White , Li Zhao , Lei Huo , Elizabeth A. Mittendorf , Alastair Mark Thompson , Jennifer Keating Litton , Banu Arun , Bora Lim , Vicente Valero , Debu Tripathy , Jianhua Zhang , Beatriz E Adrada , Lumarie Santiago , Elizabeth Ravenberg , Stacy L. Moulder , Senthil Damodaran

Organizations

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Houston, TX, Woodlands Health Campus, Singapore, Singapore, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Other Foundation
MD Anderson MoonShot, Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Background: Limited cell line and human data suggest that TNBCs characterized as mesenchymal and luminal androgen receptor (LAR) commonly have alterations in the PI3K pathway. More data is needed to better characterize the role of the PI3K pathway across TNBC subtypes. Methods: Pre-treatment tumor biopsies were collected from operable TNBC patients (pts) enrolled on a clinical trial of genomically tailored NAT (ARTEMIS; NCT02276443). Tumors were categorized into 5 groups using the Pietenpol criteria: basal-like (BL) comprised of BL-1 and BL-2, mesenchymal and mesenchymal stem-like (M), immunomodulatory (IM), LAR, or unspecified (UNS). Using whole exome sequencing data, variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions) and copy number variations (CNVs) were identified in 32 genes known to activate the PI3K pathway. Results: Tumor subtyping and pathologic response to NAT was available in 127 pts (clinical stage I: 9; II: 84; III: 34). PI3K pathway alteration defined as a variant in one of the evaluated genes and/or deletion of PTEN was seen in 76 (60%) tumors. The most frequent alterations were: PTEN deletion (21%), PIK3CA variant (11%), and PIK3R1 variant (8%). PI3K alteration and residual cancer burden (RCB) rates across TNBC subtypes are shown in the table. There was a significant difference in pathologic complete response (pCR)/RCB 0 rate after NAT across TNBC subtypes (chi2 test; P = 0.02). There was a significant difference in the incidence of PI3K pathway alteration across TNBC subtypes (chi2 test; P < 0.01). Overall, the presence of PI3K alteration was not associated with pCR (Fisher exact test; P = 0.85). Pts with M tumors had a higher rate of substantial residual disease (RCB II-III) after NAT. Presence of PI3K pathway alteration was common in the M subtype and associated with RCB II-III (82% in PI3K-altered vs 33% in wild-type tumors; Fisher exact test; P = 0.02). Presence of PI3K pathway alteration was common but not associated with response in the LAR subtype. Conclusions: The incidence of PI3K pathway alteration varied by TNBC subtype but was not associated with pathologic response to NAT with the exception of increased substantial residual disease (RCB II-III) in the M subtype.

SubtypeNPI3K Altered
N (%)
RCB 0
N (%)
RCB 0 if PI3K-Altered
N (%)
RCB II-III
N (%)
RCB II-III if PI3K-Altered
N (%)
All12776 (60)47 (37)29 (38)64 (50)40 (53)
BL3422 (65)14 (41)10 (45)16 (47)9 (41)
M3122 (71)5 (16)3 (14)21 (68)18 (82)
IM289 (32)16 (57)6 (67)9 (32)2 (22)
LAR1311 (85)3 (23)3 (27)7 (54)6 (55)
UNS2112 (57)9 (43)7 (58)11 (52)5 (42)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Biologic Correlates

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 561)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.561

Abstract #

561

Poster Bd #

53

Abstract Disclosures