Independent validation of paige prostate: Assessing clinical benefit of an artificial intelligence tool within a digital diagnostic pathology laboratory workflow.

Authors

null

Christopher Kanan

Paige, New York, NY

Christopher Kanan , Jillian Sue , Leo Grady , Thomas J. Fuchs , Sarat Chandarlapaty , Jorge S. Reis-Filho , Paulo G O Salles , Leonard Medeiros da Silva , Carlos Gil Ferreira , Emilio Marcelo Pereira

Organizations

Paige, New York, NY, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Instituto Mario Penna, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, Grupo Oncoclínicas, São Paulo, Brazil

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: The most common approach to diagnose prostate cancer is the “whole gland biopsy procedure,” in which numerous cores (≥12) are taken from different regions of the gland to maximize the chances of detecting small cancers; the presence of cancer in any of these cores is significant to the patient. If concerning features that are not fully diagnostic of cancer are identified, the pathologist may defer the final diagnosis until additional studies (e.g. immunohistochemistry) have been performed. We recently developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based system for the assessment of cancer in prostate biopsies. Here, we investigated the performance of this test in an independent dataset of prostate cancers consecutively accrued. Methods: Two board-certified pathologists retrospectively reviewed 600 digitized hematoxylin-and-eosin (H&E) stained diagnostic prostate core needle biopsy slides from 100 consecutive patients, originally diagnosed at an independent hospital. Pathologists’ assessments were based on the H&E image alone; if further testing would be preferred, it was noted in the review notes. All images were assessed by Paige Prostate 1.0, an AI-based diagnostic tool; based on its outputs (either suspicious for cancer or not), the discordant images were re-reviewed by the pathologists and, in parallel, adjudicated with additional testing (e.g. ancillary immunohistochemical markers). Results: Paige Prostate's slide-level sensitivity was 98.9% and its specificity was 93.3% (100% and 78.0%, respectively, at the subject-level). The pathologists' average slide-level sensitivity and specificity without Paige Prostate was 90.9% and 98.6%, respectively. The sensitivity with their consensus read and Paige Prostate increased by 5.7% to 96.6% with only 0.8% decrease in specificity. In addition to new slide-level findings, benefits were also observed at the subject-level; with Paige, three new prostate cancer cases were discovered that were initially missed. Conclusions: The study reflects the potential benefits of the Paige Prostate system in the hands of experienced pathologists and validates the algorithm in a completely independent dataset. Paige Prostate can improve pathologists' sensitivity when reviewing digitized H&E prostate needle biopsy images with a minor impact on specificity.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Care Delivery and Regulatory Policy

Track

Care Delivery and Quality Care

Sub Track

Clinical Informatics/Advanced Algorithms/Machine Learning

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr e14076)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.e14076

Abstract #

e14076

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

The CONFIDENT-P trial: Clinical implementation of artificial intelligence assistance in prostate cancer pathology.

First Author: Rachel Flach

First Author: Lia DePaula Oliveira