Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Dan Sha , Hee Eun Lee , Nathan R. Foster , Qian Shi , Steven R Alberts , Thomas C. Smyrk , Frank A. Sinicrope
Background: Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor budding (linked to epithelial mesenchymal transition) may influence metastatic potential and patient prognosis. We analyzed these features and their relative contribution to survival among low (T1-3 N1) and high (T4 and/or N2) risk groups, defined by the IDEA study, used to inform the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer. Methods: Among 1,532 patients (low risk n=804; high risk n=728) treated in a phase III adjuvant trial of FOLFOX + cetuximab (x 6 months), intraepithelial TIL densities and tumor budding were quantified at microscopy in routine histologic sections. Optimal cutpoints were determined in association with 5-yr disease-free survival (DFS). Relative contribution of variables to DFS was calculated using χ2 from Harrell’s rms R package based on multivariable Cox regression models. Results: In the overall cohort, the tumor budding/TILs combined variable was more robust for predition of DFS than either alone. Budding/TILs was significantly associated with DFS in both low (HRadj, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.02-2.48; p=.0273) and high (HRadj, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.72-4.63; p<.0001) risk patients. We then determined its relative contribution (%) to DFS (Table). Among low risk, budding/TILs ranked second (24.4%) behind KRAS status (45.5%) and ahead of treatment arm (7.2%) and mismatch repair (MMR) status (6.1%). Among high risk, budding/TILs contributed the most to DFS (45.4%) followed by primary tumor sidedness (13.0%), performance status (12.0%), and MMR (10.4%). Conclusions: Tumor budding/TILs provides robust prognostic stratification by risk group to improve anatomic tumor staging. The relative contribution of budding/TILs to DFS was second only to KRAS status in low risk patients, and was the most important predictor of DFS in high risk patients. Evaluation in patients treated with 3 vs 6 mos of adjuvant chemotherapy is warranted.
Low Risk (T1-3N1) | Percent (%) | High Risk (T4 and/or N2) | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|---|
KRAS | 45.5 | Budding/TILs | 45.4 |
Budding/TILs | 24.4 | Sidedness | 13.0 |
Treatment | 7.2 | Performance Status | 12.0 |
MMR | 6.1 | MMR | 10.4 |
Performance Status | 5.0 | KRAS | 9.1 |
BRAF | 5.0 | Treatment | 5.1 |
Age | 3.8 | Histologic Grade | 2.8 |
Sidedness | 2.3 | Other | 2.2 |
Histologic Grade | 0.8 |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2016 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Frank A. Sinicrope
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Rona Yaeger
2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Naohiro Tomita
2022 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Claire Gallois