Myeloablative versus non-myeloablative consolidative chemotherapy for newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma: Results of induction therapy in Alliance 51101.

Authors

null

Tracy Batchelor

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Tracy Batchelor , Sharmila Giri , Amy S. Ruppert , Nancy L. Bartlett , Eric D. Hsi , Bruce D. Cheson , Lakshmi Nayak , John Paul Leonard , James L. Rubenstein

Organizations

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, The Ohio State University, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbus, OH, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: Optimal consolidative therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is not defined. Avoidance of whole brain radiation may reduce risk of neurotoxicity. Non-radiation consolidative options include myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) or non-myeloablative chemotherapy. Methods: This is a randomized phase 2, National Clinical Trials Network study of induction methotrexate (MTX) (8 g/m2days 1, 15), temozolomide (TMZ) (150-200 mg/m2 D7-11), and rituximab (RTX) (C1 D3, 10, 17, 24 and C2 D3, 10) in four 28-day cycles followed by one cycle of cytarabine (ARA-C) (2 g/m2 BID, D1, 2) (MTRA). Following induction, patients (pts) received consolidation with thiotepa (5 mg/kg BID, D -5, -4) plus carmustine (400 mg/m2, day -6) and ASCT (Arm A) or one cycle of ARA-C (2 g/m2 BID, D1-4) plus infusional etoposide (40 mg/kg over 96h) (Arm B). The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (PFS), designed to compare consolidation regimens. This report describes the results of the 5 cycles of induction therapy. Results: 113 pts (median age 61 years, range 33-75) were randomized (Arm A: 57, Arm B: 56) across 27 centers. 108 eligible pts who received induction therapy were evaluated. 36 pts (33.3%) did not proceed to consolidation, mainly due to disease progression (17), pt withdrawal (8), or adverse events including death (6). Grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 12 pts (11.1%) during induction. Dose modifications of MTX were required in 75% of pts and 63.3% of cycles, mainly due to renal adjustments. Dose delays of MTX were required in 52.8% of pts and 22.2% of cycles. Overall response rate (CR, CRu, PR) at the end of induction was 65.7% (95% CI, 56%, 74.6%). Conclusions: While MTRA is feasible and active a significant proportion of pts did not receive consolidation, supporting the need to develop more effective induction strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT01511562.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01511562

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 8042)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.8042

Abstract #

8042

Poster Bd #

375

Abstract Disclosures