Phase I/II study of SAR439859, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC).

Authors

null

Mario Campone

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, René Gauducheau, St Herblain, France

Mario Campone , Aditya Bardia , Gary A. Ulaner , Sarat Chandarlapaty , Alice Gosselin , Séverine Doroumian , Vasiliki Pelekanou , Marina Celanovic , Hannah M. Linden

Organizations

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, René Gauducheau, St Herblain, France, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Sanofi, Paris, France, Sanofi, Montpellier, France, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Sanofi

Background: SERDs competitively antagonize and degrade the ER and can block signaling in ER-dependent tumors resistant to standard endocrine therapy (ET). This study (NCT03284957) investigates SAR439859, a potent oral SERD, in ER+/HER2- mBC. We present pooled dose escalation/expansion (Part A/B) data for SAR439859. Methods: Postmenopausal patients (pts) with ER+/HER2- mBC treated for ≥ 6 mos with prior ET received SAR439859 ≥ 150 mg QD (Part A) or 400 mg QD (Part B). Chemotherapy and targeted therapy in the advanced setting were allowed. Objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1), clinical benefit rate (CBR; complete or partial response [PR] or stable disease [SD] ≥ 24 weeks), safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) were assessed. Results: Pts (n = 62; Part A, 13; Part B, 49) had a median age of 63 yrs (range 37–88) and ECOG PS 0 (59.7%) or 1 (40.3%); 93.5% had visceral disease. All had prior ET, 74.2% had prior targeted therapy and 48.4% had ≥ 3 prior lines in the advanced setting. 61.3% of pts had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), all grade 1–2. Most frequent: hot flush (16.1%), constipation, arthralgia (both 9.7%), decreased appetite, vomiting, diarrhea, nausea (all 8.1%), fatigue (6.5%). No pts discontinued due to AEs. CBR was 35.6% overall, with antitumor activity irrespective of ESR1 mutation status (Table). In pts with no prior SERD, CDK4/6 or mTOR inhibitors (n = 14), ORR was 21.4% and CBR 64.3%. PK data for Part B and ESR1 mutation data will be provided. Conclusions: SAR439859 had a favorable safety profile with limited TRAEs. In these heavily pre-treated pts (prior targeted therapy in 74.2%), ORR and CBR were similar to historical fulvestrant performance in pts with no prior targeted therapy. Encouraging ORR and CBR in pts with no prior SERD, CDK4/6 or mTOR inhibitors (n = 14; ORR 21.4%; CBR 64.3%) supports SAR439859 development in earlier lines of therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03284957.

Pts, n (%)All
n = 59
ESR1 wildtype
n = 30a
ESR1 mutant
n = 28a
Best response
    PR4 (6.8)3 (10.0)1 (3.6)
    SD25 (42.4)12 (40.0)13 (46.4)
    Progressive disease30 (50.8)15 (50.0)14 (50.0)
ORR4 (6.8)3 (10.0)1 (3.6)
CBR21 (35.6)12 (40.0)9 (32.1)

aESR1 status available for n = 58

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Hormone Receptor-Positive

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03284957

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 1070)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1070

Abstract #

1070

Poster Bd #

155

Abstract Disclosures