Pyrotinib combined with capecitabine as first-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials.

Authors

null

Zefei Jiang

The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China

Zefei Jiang , Binghe Xu , Min Yan , Quchang Ouyang , Xi-Chun Hu , Wei Li , Ji Feng Feng , Qingyuan Zhang , Zhongsheng Tong , Ping Yan , Xiaoyu Zhu , Shangyi Rong , Jianjun Zou

Organizations

The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China, The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu, China, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd

Background: Anti-HER2 agents combined with chemotherapy is the treatment strategy for treatment-naive HER2-positive relapsed or metastatic breast cancer. This pooled study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of pyrotinib plus capecitabine as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive relapsed or metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Data were derived from three randomized controlled trials. In the phase 2 (NCT02422199) and the PHOEBE phase 3 (NCT03080805) studies, patients were randomized to receive pyrotinib plus capecitabine or lapatinib plus capecitabine. In the PHENIX phase 3 (NCT02973737) study, patients were randomly assigned and given pyrotinib plus capecitabine or placebo plus capecitabine. Patients who had received neither anti-HER2 agents nor chemotherapy for the relapsed or metastatic disease were included in the analyses, and the pooled tumor response data (per blinded independent central review) were reported herein. Results: In the pooled analysis of all three studies, 145 patients received pyrotinib plus capecitabine. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months (95% CI, 11.1 months to not reached). The objective response rate (ORR) reached 72.4% (95% CI, 64.4% to 79.5%). In the pooled analysis involving the phase 2 and PHOEBE phase 3, 84 patients were treated with pyrotinib plus capecitabine and 62 patients with lapatinib plus capecitabine. The PFS was significantly prolonged with pyrotinib plus capecitabine vs lapatinib plus capecitabine (median, 12.4 months [95% CI, 11.1 months to not reached] vs 8.2 months [95% CI, 5.5 to 9.7 months]; hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.66]; p = 0.0001). The ORR was 71.4% (95% CI, 60.5% to 80.8%) with pyrotinib plus capecitabine compared with 58.1% (95% CI, 44.8% to 70.5%) with lapatinib plus capecitabine. Conclusions: The pooled analysis demonstrated pyrotinib plus capecitabine was efficacious as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-positive relapsed or metastatic breast cancer, offering a potent treatment option for these patients.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

HER2-Positive

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr e13022)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.e13022

Abstract #

e13022

Abstract Disclosures