Impact of an immuno-oncology (IO) education/monitoring program on patient’s self-efficacy and adverse event reporting from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Authors

null

Parneet Kaur Cheema

William Osler Health System, University of Toronto, Brampton, ON, Canada

Parneet Kaur Cheema , Massey Nematollahi , FeRevelyn Berco , Janet Papadakos , Deepanjali Kaushik , Priscilla Matthews , Marco Iafolla , Kirstin Perdrizet , Margaret Balcewicz , William Raskin , Stephen Reingold , Juhi Husain , Philip Kuruvilla , Henry Jacob Conter

Organizations

William Osler Health System, University of Toronto, Brampton, ON, Canada, William Osler Health System, Brampton, ON, Canada, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: ICIs have unique side effects of immune related adverse events (irAEs). For early detection and management of irAEs, at a large community hospital we implemented a standard IO nursing baseline assessment, education and monitoring program. We studied it’s impact on a patient’s irAE reporting and self-efficacy (confidence to manage symptoms) of ICIs. Methods: Prospective study conducted at William Osler Health System, Brampton, Canada from May 2018-December 2019. Patients aged > = 18, English speaking that received an ICI for cancer were included. Patients underwent a standardized baseline nursing assessment and education class. Patients identified at the assessment as high risk (risk of grade 3/4 irAE >20%) had weekly nurse proactive calls. Cancer Behaviour Inventory – Brief Version (CBI-B) (Heitzmann et al, 2011) was used to evaluate patient’s self-efficacy. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled. Median follow up of 4.1 months. Baseline demographics: median age 69, 70% males, 77% Caucasian, 81% ECOG 0/1, 66% had English as their first language and 19% highest education was elementary, 30% high school, 26% trade diploma and 21% post-secondary. Fourty-one percent had limited cancer health literacy (measured by CHLT6 (Dumenci et al, 2014)). ICIs prescribed were 70% monotherapy anti-PD1/PDL1, 13% combination nivolumab/ipilimumab, 17% anti-PD1/PDL1 + chemotherapy/other therapies. Majority had a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (55%), melanoma (19%) and renal cell carcinoma (9%). A statistically significant improvement in the average CBI-B scores were found pre and post baseline assessment/education (p < 0.001) and this improvement was maintained over time at follow-up visits (non-significant change in scores from post education results). Fourty-three percent of patient’s experienced > 1 irAE. Most were grade 1/2 at time of detection (65%). Method of detection was mainly by patient self-reporting (62%), followed by proactive calls (27%). Only 3 patients had detection of an irAE with an ER visit. Rate of discontinuation of ICIs due to toxicity was 8.8%. Conclusions: In this diverse patient population with almost half of patients having limited cancer health literacy, a standardized IO baseline assessment, education and monitoring program resulted in improved patient self-efficacy with most irAEs detected by self-reporting and proactive calls. Our IO program can be a model for other oncology programs.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Care Delivery and Regulatory Policy

Track

Care Delivery and Quality Care

Sub Track

Care Delivery

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 2032)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.2032

Abstract #

2032

Poster Bd #

24

Abstract Disclosures