A phase II trial of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with relapsed/refractory and unresectable malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors

Kanwal Raghav

Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav , Michael J. Overman , Suyu Liu , Anneleis Willett , Richard Eldon Royal , Anais Malpica , Christopher Scally , Ignacio Ivan Wistuba , Andrew Futreal , Armeen Mahvash , Cindy Yun , Shannon Dervin , Edward Francis Mckenna Jr., Katja Schulze , Patrick Hwu , James C. Yao , Scott Kopetz , Gauri Rajani Varadhachary , Daniel M. Halperin

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Genentech Inc., MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Background: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is an orphan malignancy. No recommended/FDA approved therapies exist for salvage treatment beyond first-line platinum and pemetrexed based chemotherapy. While immune checkpoint inhibition has shown preliminary efficacy in mesotheliomas, data and efficacy is limited in MPeM patients (pts) [objective response rate (ORR) ~ 11%; median progression-free survival (mPFS) ~ 4 months (m); median overall survival (mOS) ~ 11 m]. We aimed to prospectively assess the safety and efficacy of combined anti-PD1 (atezolizumab) and VEGF (bevacizumab) blockade (AtezoBev) in pts with MPeM. Methods: In this phase 2 study, eligible pts with histologically confirmed MPeM, ECOG PS 0-1, and prior platinum and pemetrexed treatment were treated with 1200 mg of atezolizumab and 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab IV every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary endpoint was confirmed ORR by RECIST 1.1 by independent radiology review. Duration of response (DOR), PFS and OS were pre-specified secondary endpoints. Results: Among 20 enrolled pts (3/2017 - 2/2019), median age was 63 (range, 33-87) years, 12 (60%) were female, 12 (60%) had PS 0, and 2 (10%) had biphasic MPeM. Among 20 evaluable pts (median cycles 14), confirmed ORR was 35% (7 pts; 95% CI: 15.4-59.2) (median DOR 8.8 m). Responses were ongoing in 5/7 (71.4%) pts at data cutoff. The median follow-up was 20.5 months. Six deaths were observed during follow-up, and the 1-year OS was 79% (95% CI: 52 – 91) (median OS ~ NR). Median PFS was estimated as 17.6 m (95% CI: 9.1 – NR). The 1-year PFS was 54% (95% CI: 28 – 74). Grade 3 (no grade 4/5) treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 10 (50%) pts; most common being hypertension (40%) and anemia (10%). Two (10%) pts had grade 3 immune-related adverse events. Translational studies are ongoing. Conclusions: AtezoBev showed promising and durable efficacy in relapsed/refractory MPeM with acceptable safety profile. Ongoing multiomic analyses of pre and on-treatment tissue/liquid biopsies obtained on all these pts will provide additional insight into mechanisms and biomarkers of response and resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT03074513

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Local-Regional/Small Cell/Other Thoracic Cancers

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Mesothelioma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03074513

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 9013)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9013

Abstract #

9013

Poster Bd #

206

Abstract Disclosures