Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Georgina V. Long , Jacob Schachter , Ana Arance , Jean-Jacques Grob , Laurent Mortier , Adil Daud , Matteo S. Carlino , Antoni Ribas , Catriona M. McNeil , Michal Lotem , James M. G. Larkin , Paul Lorigan , Bart Neyns , Christian U. Blank , Teresa M. Petrella , Omid Hamid , Erin Jensen , Clemens Krepler , Scott J. Diede , Caroline Robert
Background: 5-year follow-up of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-006 study (NCT01866319) showed pembro improved OS vs ipilimumab (ipi) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma. 3-y OS rate from pembro completion for pts who completed 2 y of pembro was 93.8%. Results with 8 mo of additional follow-up are presented to inform clinical care. Methods: Eligible pts with ipi-naive advanced melanoma, ≤1 prior therapy for BRAF-mutant disease, and ECOG PS 0 or 1 were randomized to pembro 10 mg/kg Q2W or Q3W for ≤2 y or ipi 3 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses. Pts discontinuing pembro with CR, PR, or SD after ≥94 weeks were considered pts with 2-y pembro. Pts who stopped pembro with SD, PR or CR could receive ≤12 mo of additional pembro (2nd course) upon disease progression if still eligible. ORR was assessed per immune-related response criteria by investigator review. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Pembro arm data were pooled. Post hoc ITT efficacy analyses are shown. Results: Median follow-up from randomization to data cutoff (Jul 31, 2019) was 66.7 mo in the pembro and 66.9 mo in the ipi arms. OS outcomes are shown in Table. For the 103 pts with 2-y pembro (30 CR, 63 PR, 10 SD), median follow-up from completion was 42.9 mo (95% CI, 39.9-46.3).Median DOR was not reached. 36-mo OS from pembro completion was 100% (95% CI, 100.0-100.0) for pts with CR, 94.8% (95% CI, 84.7-98.3) for pts with PR, and 66.7% (95% CI, 28.2-87.8) for pts with SD. 15 pts received 2nd-course pembro; BOR in 1st course was 6 CR, 6 PR, and 3 SD. Median time from end of 1st course to start of 2ndcourse was 24.5 mo (range, 4.9-41.4). Median follow-up in pts who received 2nd-course pembro was 25.3 mo (range, 3.5-39.4). Median duration of 2nd-course pembro was 8.3 mo (range, 1.4-12.6). BOR on 2ndcourse was 3 CR, 5 PR (ongoing responses, 7 pts), 3 SD (ongoing, 2 pts), and 2 PD (1 death); 2 pts pending. Conclusions: Pembro improves the long-term survival vs ipi in pts with advanced melanoma, with all pts who completed therapy in CR still alive at 5 years. Retreatment with pembro at progression in pts who stopped at SD or better can provide additional clinical benefit in a majority of pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01866319
Deaths (additional since last data cutoff Dec 3, 2019), n | Median OS (95% CI), mo | HR | 5-Y OS rate (95% CI), % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pembro (N = 556) | 328 (4) | 32.7 (24.5-41.6) | 0.74 | 39.7 (35.5-43.8) |
Ipi (N = 278) | 173 (1) | 15.9 (13.3-22.0) | – | 31.0 (25.3-36.9) |
1L pembro (n = 368) | 203 (1) | 38.7 (27.3-50.8) | 0.72 | 43.3 (38.0-48.4) |
1L ipi (n = 181) | 111 (1) | 17.1 (13.8-26.2) | – | 33.0 (25.8-40.3) |
2L pembro (n = 97) | 125 (3) | 23.5 (16.8-34.2) | 0.78 | 32.3 (25.5-39.3) |
2L ipi (n = 187) | 62 (0) | 13.6 (10.7-22.0) | – | 27.3 (18.3-37.0) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Timothy Hanna
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Dirk Schadendorf
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Daniel Olson
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Jason Alan Chesney