Mismatch between mortality burden and number of FDA registration trials in highly lethal cancers.

Authors

Bishal Gyawali

Bishal Gyawali

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Bishal Gyawali , Peter C. Yang , Sam Rubinstein , Martin W. Schoen , Ali Raza Khaki , Jeremy Lyle Warner

Organizations

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, Mass General/North Shore Cancer Center, Danvers, MA, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: Treatment successes in cancer are achieved through new drugs tested in clinical trials. However, drug discovery has been disparate across cancer types for various reasons. We sought to investigate if the number of trials used to support United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approvals is proportional to the incidence and mortality burden of highly lethal cancers, i.e. those with an expected relative mortality of >5% per Cancer Statistics, 2020 (Siegel et al.). Methods: All FDA labels for 258 antineoplastic cancer drugs approved as of January 2020 were reviewed for citations of registration trials supporting initial approval and additional indications. Trials were identified by matching described characteristics (e.g., patients enrolled, clinical trial NCT codes) to publications indexed on HemOnc.org. Trials were labeled by cancer type studied and type of trial (randomized vs non-randomized). Results: We identified 559 registration trials in total. Results for the six highly lethal cancers are shown in the table. The percent of registration trials was roughly proportional to incidence, but not mortality burden. For example, despite the 22% expected mortality burden of lung cancer, it had a share of only 11% of registration trials whereas breast cancer has an expected 7% mortality burden, with a share of 14% of registration trials. Chronic myeloid leukemia is expected to cause 1,130 deaths in 2020 (0.2%) and has had 20 registration trials (3.6%). The highly lethal cancers had a higher rate of randomized trials supporting approval than other cancers (84% vs 56%, p<0.001 [Chi-square]). Conclusions: While the findings may in part be due to disease biology (e.g., pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has proven resistant to many novel therapies), our evaluation highlights a potential mismatch between resources and needs. Randomized trials were more often used to support new drug approvals in highly lethal cancers. These findings will be important in regulatory policy.

Cancer typeExpected Cases, 2020 (%)Expected Deaths, 2020 (%)Registration Trials (%)Of which, Randomized (%)
Lung*228,820 (13)135,720 (22)59 (11)46 (78)
Colorectal147,950 (8)53,200 (9)33 (6)26 (79)
Pancreas**57,600 (3)47,050 (8)9 (2)8 (89)
Breast279,100 (15)42,690 (7)80 (14)74 (92.5)
Prostate191,930 (11)33,330 (5)31 (5)25 (81)
Liver & Bile duct42,810 (2)30,170 (5)7 (1)5 (71)
Subtotal948,210 (52)342,160 (56)219184 (84)
Total1,806,590606,520559375 (67)

*Includes small cell and non-small cell histologies **Includes adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine histologies

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Care Delivery and Regulatory Policy

Track

Care Delivery and Quality Care

Sub Track

Health and Regulatory Policy

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 2072)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.2072

Abstract #

2072

Poster Bd #

64

Abstract Disclosures