Randomized phase III trial of eribulin (E) versus standard weekly paclitaxel (P) as first- or second-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Authors

null

Minetta C. Liu

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Minetta C. Liu , David W. Hillman , Ashley Elizabeth Frith , Alan P. Lyss , Douglas Jay Weckstein , Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia , Nguyet Le-Lindqwister , Claudine Isaacs , Donald B. Wender , DeQuincy Andrew Lewis , John T. Cole , Anthony John Jaslowski , Kendrith M. Rowland , Thomas H. Openshaw , Bret Edward Buckley Friday , Gini F. Fleming , Erik Asmus , Lauren J. Rogak , Ethan M. Basch , Amylou C. Dueck

Organizations

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Mayo Clinic Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Rochester, MN, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, Missouri Baptist Cancer Ctr, St Louis, MO, New Hampshire Oncology-Hematology, Hooksett, NH, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, Onc Hem Assoc, Peoria, IL, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, June E. Nylen Cancer Center, Sioux City, IA, Randolph Cancer Ctr, Asheboro, NC, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, Wisconsin NCORP, Green Bay, WI, Carle Clinic Assoc, Champaign, IL, Northern Light Cancer Care, Brewer, ME, SMDC, Duluth, MN, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Eisai

Background: The ph III EMBRACE trial of E vs physician’s choice of tx led to FDA approval of E as ≥3rd-line tx for MBC pts with prior exposure to anthracyclines/taxanes. The ph III BOLD 301 trial of E vs capecitabine in advanced BC treated with anthracyclines/taxanes showed a nonsignificant trend to improved median OS for all pts; pre-planned analysis by HER2 status revealed a nominally significant benefit for HER2- pts. Methods: RU011201I is an investigator initiated ph III trial with 1:1 randomization to E (1.4 mg/m2 D1,8 q21days) vs P (90 mg/m2 D1,8,15 q28days) within strata defined by (neo)adjuvant taxanes (yes/no), HR status (+/-), and line of tx (1st/2nd). Pts had measurable or non-measurable disease by RECIST v1.1; new or progressive mets; peripheral neuropathy (PN) gr<2; ≤1 prior chemotx regimens for advanced or MBC. Asymptomatic brain mets with stable MRIs for >3 mos were allowed. (Neo)adjuvant taxanes were allowed if >12 mos between tx completion and disease recurrence. Radiographic studies occur q12wks. Survival data are collected q12wks after the Off-Tx Visit. Pts reported side effects weekly; post-baseline symptomatic AE rates worse than baseline were compared between arms using Fisher’s exact tests. We report clinical outcomes and the primary objective related to PRO-CTCAE use. Results: 201 pts enrolled 3/2014 - 5/2018 with 33.8 mos median f/u; 3 are on tx as of 2/20/20 (1E, 2P). Pt characteristics were the same between E vs P: median age 62 yrs (range 27-85); 42% prior taxane; 78% ER+; 70% starting 1st line tx. Baseline lesion distribution was similar except for lung mets (37E, 53P). No difference was seen between E vs P in PFS (5.7 vs 5.9 mos; P=0.72), OS (18.1 vs 16.4 mos; P=0.75), TTF (5.3 vs 4.9 mos; P=0.82), DOR (10.8 vs 12.3 mos; P=0.84), or number of metastatic events (55 vs 54). 37E and 36P pts required ≥1 dose reduction. Hematologic toxicities ≥ gr 3 were higher with E (40 vs 22%). PN events were similar: 56 vs 58 total, 4 vs 7 motor, 52 vs 51 sensory. Median duration of PN and median time to 1st PN event were 74 vs 140 and 56 vs 41 days. Worsened numbness/tingling severity and other pt-reported AE rates were similar, but worsened numbness/tingling interference (63% vs 78%, P=0.04) and vomiting frequency (35% vs 57%, P=0.005) were lower with E. Conclusions: Clinical outcomes were equivalent with E vs P as 1st/2nd line tx for HER2- advanced BC. The nature and severity of PN were similar between arms, but time of onset, duration, and interference with daily living favor E. E may be a suitable treatment option in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02037529.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Other Breast Cancer Subtypes

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02037529

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 1016)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1016

Abstract #

1016

Poster Bd #

101

Abstract Disclosures