Oncological outcomes of 356 patients undergoing salvage focal ablative HIFU or cryotherapy following radiation failure.

Authors

null

Deepika Reddy

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Deepika Reddy , Taimur T. Shah , Marieke van Son , Stephanie Guillaumier , Feargus Hosking-Jervis , Tim Dudderidge , Stuart McCracken , Raj Nigam , Richard Hindley , Neil McCartan , Naveed Afzal , Henry Lewi , Raj Persad , Jaspal Virdi , Clement Orczyk , Caroline Moore , Manit Arya , Mark Emberton , Mathias Winkler , Hashim Uddin Ahmed

Organizations

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, Utrecht Medical Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands, University College London, Londo, United Kingdom, Imperial Prostate, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom, Hampshire Hospital NHS Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom, Dorset County Hampshire NHS Trust, Dorchester, United Kingdom, Springfield Hospital, Chelmsford, United Kingdom, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom, The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, United Kingdom, University College London, London, United Kingdom, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Patients that have previously failed radiotherapy for prostate cancer is usually limited to systemic therapy due to morbidity from salvage prostatectomy. We reviewed the outcomes following focal salvage ablative therapy with HIFU or cryotherapy within the UK’s HEAT and ICE registries. Methods: 356 consecutive patients underwent focal ablative treatment after initial radiation treatment failure (28/1/2004-1/10/2019, 194 (54.5%) underwent HIFU (posterior recurrence) and 162 (45.5%) underwent cryotherapy (mostly anterior or T3b). Primary outcome was failure-free survival (FFS) defined as no systemic therapy, whole-gland treatment, metastases or prostate cancer-specific death. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and overall survival. Results: Median (IQR) age was 69years (65-73) and PSA (IQR) was 4.0ng/ml (1-7-7.2). Overall median (IQR) follow-up was 41.3 months (21.4-58.5). Quadrant ablation was performed in 128 (36.0%), hemi-ablation performed in 64 (18.0%), hockey-stick in 5 (1.4%) and 159 (43.8%) had unknown ablative patterns. Due to histological or MRI proven recurrence/residual disease, 31 (8.7%) underwent further focal salvage re-treatment. FFS (95%CI) at 3 and 6 years were 81% (76-87%) and 75% (68-83%) respectively. Median (IQR) time to failure was 15.5 months (19.7). Overall survival (95%CI) at 3 and 6 years were 97% (95-100%) and 88% (81-96%) respectively. Prostate-specific mortality was 2.8%. Overall 3 (0.8%) patients were managed for fistula formation, 16 (4.5%) were treated for UTIs. Conclusions: Salvage focal ablative therapy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer is safe and provides good short to medium-term oncological control. The FORECAST study is awaited to further determine oncological outcomes in this cohort.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer–Local-Regional Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 5582)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.5582

Abstract #

5582

Poster Bd #

163

Abstract Disclosures