Comparison of genomic instability test scores used for predicting PARP activity in ovarian cancer.

Authors

null

Kirsten M Timms

Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT

Gordon B. Mills , Michael Perry , Alexander Gutin , Jerry Lanchbury , Robert Brown , Kirsten M Timms

Organizations

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, Imperial College London and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.

Background: Clinical trials have explored the utility of various genomic instability (GI) scores or gene panels to assess deficiencies in the homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair pathway and support PARP inhibitor use in ovarian cancer; however, these methods of assessing homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) may not be equivalent. The myChoice HRD test is the only analytically and clinically validated, FDA-approved HRD test that includes BRCA1/2 mutation status and three measures of GI. We compared the proportion of patients identified as candidates for PARP inhibitor use by two measures of HRD [percent loss of heterozygosity (%LOH), 11-gene panel] to myChoice HRD. Methods: Whole-genome SNP analysis was used to reconstruct ovarian tumor genomic profiles to calculate the myChoice HRD score and %LOH in 2 cohorts (clinical laboratory cohort, N = 3,278; SCOTROC4 trial, N = 248). Mutation screening for a set of 11 genes in the HR pathway (ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CHEK2, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D) was performed for a subset of tumors from the SCOTROC trial (n = 187). Samples were considered positive if the myChoice HRD score was above the threshold (threshold scores of 42 and 33 were assessed), %LOH above the threshold (16%), or a pathogenic variant in one of the 11 HR genes. The correlation between positive results from %LOH and the 11-gene panel were compared to myChoice HRD. Percent positive agreement (PPA) was the proportion of positive test results from myChoice HRD that were also positive by %LOH or the 11-gene panel. Results: The table shows the correlation and PPA between myChoice HRD, %LOH, and the 11-gene panel. Overall, 19%-61% of patients identified as positive by myChoice HRD would have been missed by %LOH or the 11-gene panel in these two cohorts. Conclusions: These data show that HRD tests used in published and ongoing clinical trials are not equivalent, and they should not be considered interchangeable in predicting PARP inhibitor response in clinical practice.

%LOH11-gene panel
Clinical testing dataset
    Correlation0.845-
    PPA – myChoice HRD ≥4267.7%-
    PPA – myChoice HRD ≥3353.5%-
SCOTROC4 cohort
    Correlation0.89n/a*
    PPA – myChoice HRD ≥4280.88%53.06%
    PPA – myChoice HRD ≥3360.61%38.57%

*Could not be calculated because positive results by the 11-gene panel were not continuous

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Cancer Prevention, Risk Reduction, and Genetics

Track

Prevention, Risk Reduction, and Genetics

Sub Track

Germline Genetic Testing

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 1586)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1586

Abstract #

1586

Poster Bd #

78

Abstract Disclosures