Bayer U.S. LLC, Whippany, NJ
Shan Jiang , Emi Terasawa , Viviana Garcia Horton , Rajeev Ayyagari , A. Reginald Waldeck , Susan Halabi , Neal D. Shore
Background: Randomized nmCRPC trials comparing darolutamide (D), apalutamide (A) and enzalutamide (E) have not been reported. Safety of these therapeutics has important implications in assessing patient risk-benefit concerns. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) is a method to perform indirect treatment comparisons adjusting for cross-trial heterogeneity. Objective: To compare the safety outcomes of D vs. A or E using MAIC. Methods: Data from the ARAMIS (D vs. placebo [PBO]), SPARTAN (A vs. PBO) and PROSPER (E vs. PBO) trials were used. Key safety outcomes including adverse events (AEs) that have central nervous system relevance were compared using anchored MAIC. Individual patient level data (IPD) from ARAMIS were selected and re-weighted to match the inclusion criteria and baseline characteristics published in SPARTAN and PROSPER (no access to their IPD). The Benjamini-Hochberg approach was applied to adjust for multiplicity. The D vs A MAIC matched on 7 covariates: age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and doubling time, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), Gleason score, bone-sparing agent use and prior surgery. Sensitivity analyses were conducted matching on different sets of covariates. D vs. E were matched on age, region, PSA level and doubling time, ECOG, Gleason score and bone-sparing agent use. Risk difference (RD) ([DARO – PBOARAMIS] – [ENZA – PBOPROSPER]) and odds ratio (OR) (ORARAMIS/ORPROSPER) were calculated. RD<0 or OR<1 indicate lower AE risk for D. Results: For D vs. A, the effective sample sizes (ESS) of D and its placebo (PBO) arm were 604 and 391 after matching. Fall, fracture, and rash were statistically significantly lower for D vs. A (Table). For D vs. E, the ESS of D and PBO arm were 580 and 395, respectively. Fall, dizziness, mental impairment, hypertension, fatigue and severe fatigue were statistically significantly lower for D vs. E. Conclusions: After adjusting for trial differences, D showed favorable safety profile in fall, dizziness, mental-impairment, hypertension, rash, fatigue, and fracture.
AEs a | D minus A % [RD] | D/A [OR] | D minus E % [RD] | D/E [OR] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fall | -6.3* | 0.6 | -6.3* | 0.4** |
Dizziness | -1.0 | 1.0 | -4.9* | 0.5 |
Mental-impairment | -2.6 | 0.4 | -3.5* | 0.3** |
Hypertension | -2.4 | 1.2 | -3.9** | 0.7 |
Rash | -16.0* | 0.5 | NR | NR |
Fatigue | -4.4 | 0.9 | -12.8* | 0.6** |
Severe fatigue | -0.7 | 0.3 | -2.2* | 0.2 |
Fracture | -6.2* | 0.4** | NR | NR |
a All grades AEs with the exception of severe fatigue (grade 3+) * Raw and multiplicity adjusted p-value <0.05 ** Raw p-value <0.05 NR=not reported in PROSPER
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Daniel J. George
2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Joshua Z. Drago
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Alicia K. Morgans
2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Tomasz M. Beer