Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
Jared Weiss , Jerome Goldschmidt , Andric Zoran , Konstantin H. Dragnev , Yili Pritchett , Shannon R. Morris , Rajesh K. Malik , Davey B. Daniel
Background: Chemotherapy (CT) is a mainstay of cancer treatment; however, its side effects, notably myelosuppression, cause significant suffering. Trilaciclib (T) is an IV CDK4/6 inhibitor that protects hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by preventing proliferation during CT administration. Results from three randomized, double-blind, placebo (P)-controlled phase II trials in patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have previously been reported. Data from these studies were pooled to understand the effects of T on specific myelosuppression endpoints with greater statistical precision. Methods: All pts received standard CT (etoposide/carboplatin [E/C], E/C/atezolizumab, or topotecan) plus T or P. Analyses were conducted on pooled intent-to-treat datasets from three ES-SCLC studies (NCT02499770; NCT03041311; NCT02514447). Results: 123 pts were treated with T and 119 with P. Median age in both groups was 64 years. Addition of T decreased measures of myelosuppression and the need for supportive care interventions (Table). From the pooled dataset, median OS and PFS (months [95% CI]) were comparable between pts treated with T vs P (OS: 10.6 [9.1, 11.7] vs 10.6 [7.9, 12.8]; PFS: 5.3 [4.6, 6.1] vs 5.0 [4.4, 5.5], respectively). Fewer pts on T had grade 3/4 hematologic events (54 [44.3%]) vs P (91 [77.1%]). Among pts who continued after cycle 1, 11 pts (9.2%) treated with T had ≥1 CT dose reduction vs 36 (30.8%) with P. Conclusions: T significantly and meaningfully reduced both CT-induced myelosuppression and its consequences, with no detrimental effect on PFS or OS, thus improving the patient experience with CT in ES-SCLC. T has potential to become a new standard of care for preventing myelosuppression in SCLC.
T + CT (n=123) | P + CT (n=119) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Mean duration of severe neutropenia in cycle 1, days (SD) | 0 (1.8) | 4 (5.1) | <0.0001* |
Severe neutropenia, n (%) | 14 (11.4) | 63 (52.9) | <0.0001 |
Febrile neutropenia, n (%) | 4 (3.3) | 11 (9.2) | 0.089 |
G-CSF administration, n (%) | 35 (28.5) | 67 (56.3) | <0.0001 |
Grade 3/4 anemia, n (%) | 25 (20.3) | 38 (31.9) | 0.028 |
RBC transfusion on/after Week 5, n (%) | 18 (14.6) | 31 (26.1) | 0.025 |
ESA administration, n (%) | 4 (3.3) | 14 (11.8) | 0.025 |
Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, n (%) | 24 (19.5) | 43 (36.1) | 0.0067 |
Platelet transfusion, n (%) | 10 (8.1) | 11 (9.2) | 0.96 |
*Two-sided p value calculated using nonparametric ANCOVA; other p values calculated using modified Poisson method.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Jerome H. Goldschmidt
2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Ajeet Gajra
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Maria Rosario García Campelo
2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Jerome H. Goldschmidt