Myelopreservation and reduced use of supportive care with trilaciclib in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Authors

Jared Weiss

Jared Weiss

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

Jared Weiss , Jerome Goldschmidt , Andric Zoran , Konstantin H. Dragnev , Yili Pritchett , Shannon R. Morris , Rajesh K. Malik , Davey B. Daniel

Organizations

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, US Oncology Research, McKesson Specialty Health, Blacksburg, VA, University Hospital Medical Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia, Norris Cotton Cancer Center Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, NH, G1 Therapeutics, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.

Background: Chemotherapy (CT) is a mainstay of cancer treatment; however, its side effects, notably myelosuppression, cause significant suffering. Trilaciclib (T) is an IV CDK4/6 inhibitor that protects hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by preventing proliferation during CT administration. Results from three randomized, double-blind, placebo (P)-controlled phase II trials in patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have previously been reported. Data from these studies were pooled to understand the effects of T on specific myelosuppression endpoints with greater statistical precision. Methods: All pts received standard CT (etoposide/carboplatin [E/C], E/C/atezolizumab, or topotecan) plus T or P. Analyses were conducted on pooled intent-to-treat datasets from three ES-SCLC studies (NCT02499770; NCT03041311; NCT02514447). Results: 123 pts were treated with T and 119 with P. Median age in both groups was 64 years. Addition of T decreased measures of myelosuppression and the need for supportive care interventions (Table). From the pooled dataset, median OS and PFS (months [95% CI]) were comparable between pts treated with T vs P (OS: 10.6 [9.1, 11.7] vs 10.6 [7.9, 12.8]; PFS: 5.3 [4.6, 6.1] vs 5.0 [4.4, 5.5], respectively). Fewer pts on T had grade 3/4 hematologic events (54 [44.3%]) vs P (91 [77.1%]). Among pts who continued after cycle 1, 11 pts (9.2%) treated with T had ≥1 CT dose reduction vs 36 (30.8%) with P. Conclusions: T significantly and meaningfully reduced both CT-induced myelosuppression and its consequences, with no detrimental effect on PFS or OS, thus improving the patient experience with CT in ES-SCLC. T has potential to become a new standard of care for preventing myelosuppression in SCLC.

T + CT
(n=123)
P + CT
(n=119)
P value
Mean duration of severe neutropenia in cycle 1, days (SD)0 (1.8)4 (5.1)<0.0001*
Severe neutropenia, n (%)14 (11.4)63 (52.9)<0.0001
Febrile neutropenia, n (%)4 (3.3)11 (9.2)0.089
G-CSF administration, n (%)35 (28.5)67 (56.3)<0.0001
Grade 3/4 anemia, n (%)25 (20.3)38 (31.9)0.028
RBC transfusion on/after Week 5, n (%)18 (14.6)31 (26.1)0.025
ESA administration, n (%)4 (3.3)14 (11.8)0.025
Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, n (%)24 (19.5)43 (36.1)0.0067
Platelet transfusion, n (%)10 (8.1)11 (9.2)0.96

*Two-sided p value calculated using nonparametric ANCOVA; other p values calculated using modified Poisson method.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Symptoms and Survivorship

Track

Symptom Science and Palliative Care

Sub Track

Palliative Care and Symptom Management

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 12096)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.12096

Abstract #

12096

Poster Bd #

384

Abstract Disclosures