Physiologic colonic uptake of 18F-FDG on PET/CT predicts immunotherapy response and gut microbiome diversity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors

null

Lena Cvetkovic

Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada

Lena Cvetkovic , Claudine Régis , Valerio Iebba , Lisa Derosa , Antoine Leblond , Julie Malo , Meriem Messaoudene , Wiam Belkaid , Arielle Elkrief , Bertrand Routy , Daniel Juneau

Organizations

Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada, INSERM U1015, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Centre Hospitalier Affilié Universitaire Régional (CHAUR), Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada, Centre De Recherche Du Centre Hospitalier De L'université De Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada, Centre De Recherche Du Centre Hospitalier De L'université De Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represent the backbone treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients. Emerging evidence suggests increased gut microbiome (GM) diversity is associated with favorable response. Conversely, antibiotic-induced dysbiosis may be associated with deleterious outcomes in patients receiving ICI in multiple retrospective studies and one prospective study. 18F-FDG physiologic colonic uptake on PET/CT increases following treatment with antibiotics and could be a surrogate marker for GM diversity and therefore clinical response. The aim of this study was to determine if 18F-FDG physiologic colonic uptake prior to ICI initiation correlates with outcomes and GM metagenomics in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: 71 patients with aNSCLC who underwent PET/CT prior to ICI were identified. For each patient, the colon was manually contoured, SUVmax was measured in each segment of the colon by a nuclear medicine specialist and average SUVmax was calculated for the whole colon. Patients were stratified in two groups according to median colon SUVmax (low vs high uptake). 18F-FDG physiologic colonic uptake was then compared to overall survival (OS), objective response (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS). For patients with available stool samples (n = 10), GM composition was defined using metagenomics sequencing. Results: 71 patients (54% men, median age: 68 years) with aNSCLC were included in the study and ICI was the first line of therapy in 38% of those patients. The mean colon SUV for the low and high uptake groups were 1.41 (CI 95% 1.35-1.47) and 2.18 (CI 95% 1.90-2.46) respectively. The high uptake group had a higher proportion of non-responders (p = 0.033) and significant shorter PFS (4.1 months vs 11.3 months, p = 0.005). In the caecum, high uptake also correlated with numerically shorter OS (10.82 vs 27.56 months, p = 0.058) compared to low uptake group. Despite the low number of samples, metagenomics sequencing revealed that PLS-DA (Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis) for diversity was lower in the high SUV group (p = 0.008). Conclusions: Higher colon SUVmax on pre-ICI FDG PET/CT is associated with worse clinical outcomes and lower baseline GM diversity in patients with advanced NSCLC. Here, we propose that 18F-FDG physiologic colonic uptake on PET/CT could serve as a surrogate marker of GM diversity and predicts clinical outcomes.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 9600)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9600

Abstract #

9600

Poster Bd #

366

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts