Molecular features of gliomas with high tumor mutational burden.

Authors

null

Joanne Xiu

Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ

Joanne Xiu , Kyle M Walsh , Manjari Pandey , Emil Lou , Ekokobe Fonkem , Herbert B. Newton , Erin M. Dunbar , Macarena Ines De La Fuente , Michael J. Glantz , Sandeep Mittal , David M. Ashley , Wolfgang Michael Korn , Ashley Love Sumrall

Organizations

Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, The West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, Advent Health, Orlando, FL, Piedmont Hospital, Atlanta, GA, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: TMB-H in gliomas is caused by molecular alterations or alkylator treatment- induced genomic changes characterized by a large number of G:C>A:T transitions. Our study describes the molecular features of TMB-H gliomas. Methods: Gliomas were tested with NextGen sequencing (592 genes), MGMT promoter methylation (MGMT-m) fragment analysis and IHC at Caris Life Sciences. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was test by NGS, FA/IHC. The GC:AT transition rate was calculated as the prevalence of G:A and C:T changes seen in each tumor and > 80% was regarded as high transition(TR-H). TMB values were compared using Wilcoxon Rank Sum. TMB-H was defined as the top quartile of all TMB values (TMB>9). Results: TMB in the 3129 gliomas ranged from 0 to 372 mutations/MB (mean: 8.5, median: 6). TMB-H was observed in 31% of glioblastomas, 16% of astrocytomas (astro) (22% of grade III, 7% of grade I/II) and 22% of oligodendrogliomas (oligo) (32% of grade III and 15% of grade I/II). MGMT-m (58% vs. 47%; p=0.0001), pathogenic (p) or likely p (lp) EGFR (14% vs 10%, p=0.004) and PIK3CA mutations (13% vs. 9%, p=0.002), as well as p/lp in 30 other genes were more prevalent in TMB-H cases (p<0.01). In the 613 TMB-H tumors, TR-H was seen in 12% (73) and was strongly associated with increased TMB (median TMB 52 in TR-H vs. 9 in TR-L,) and MSI-H (7.3% vs. 1.1%), both p<0.0001. Tumors with both TR-H and MSI-H had a mTMB of 114 vs. 49 in TR-H /MSS tumors. MSI-H and TR-L tumors had an mTMB of 23 vs. 9 in MSS /TR-L tumors (p<0.0001). All 5 POLE-MT tumors had TMB of >100 (median 264) and TR-L; 4 of the 5 were also MSI-H. PDL1 IHC had no correlation with TMB, MSI or transition rates. In 89 paired samples taken >150 days apart (regardless of intervening treatment), acquisition of TMB-H was seen in 11 pairs: 8 glioblastomas, 2 grade II/III astro and 2 oligo. In the paired tumors that acquired TMB-H status compared to those that did not, a significantly higher prevalence of MGMT-m (82% vs. 37%, p=0.008) and IDH mutation (64% vs. 19%, p=0.004) were seen. 10 of the 11 recurrent tumors with acquisition of TMB-H had TR-H while none in the other 78 pairs. Conclusions: TMB varies significantly in gliomas and associates with POLE, TR-H and MSI-H, but not with an increase of PD-L1. POLE-mutated tumors had the highest TMB levels. TR-H, an indicator of alkylator-induced phenotype, is associated with a higher TMB than MSI-H, however, TR-H may synergize with MSI-H to further increase TMB. Tumors with an IDH mutation and MGMT-m are more prevalent in tumors with high TMB gain. Further understanding of molecular and immune profile of the TMB-H may facilitate more individualized treatment planning.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 2549)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.2549

Abstract #

2549

Poster Bd #

40

Abstract Disclosures