Cisplatin every three weeks versus weekly cisplatin or carboplatin with definitive radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is associated with improved overall survival in a representative national population.

Authors

null

Michael Gerard McCusker

University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD

Michael Gerard McCusker , Ranee Mehra , Jason K. Molitoris , Rodney Taylor , Kevin J. Cullen , Olga G. Goloubeva

Organizations

University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: For patients with primary untreated locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (PULA-HNSCC), high dose once every 3 weeks cisplatin (HDC; 100 mg/m2) added to curative radiotherapy (RT) prolongs survival, but is associated with severe toxicities. Concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with low dose weekly cisplatin (LDC; 30-40 mg/m2), carboplatin (C), or RT alone is often substituted for HDC. We estimated and compared overall survival (OS) and acquired toxicities among Medicare beneficiaries treated with CRT using HDC, LDC, C, or RT. Methods: Patients diagnosed from 2004-2011 with PULA-HNSCC (stages III-IVB AJCC 6th and 7th editions) of the oropharynx (OPC), hypopharynx (HP), or larynx (L) who received definitive RT or CRT were identified using the linked SEER-Medicare database. An analytic cohort of patients receiving CRT with HDC, LDC, or C was constructed using well-established eligibility criteria. OS was estimated and compared between patients grouped by treatment received utilizing a multivariable stratified propensity scores weighted Cox regression model, including demographic and disease characteristics. Toxicities were compared using exact common odds-ratio and Fisher’s tests. Results: We identified 1,335 patients that received RT: OPC (n = 731), HP (n = 174), or L (n = 430). Out of those, patients were treated with HDC (n = 264), LDC (n = 259), C (n = 353), or RT alone (n = 459). Median OS (years) was 5.61 (95% CI = 4.58-7.69) for HDC, 3.7 (95% CI = 3.1-4.79) for LDC, 3.1 (95% CI = 2.48-3.86) for C, and 1.36 (95% CI = 1.19-1.58) for RT, respectively. OS was significantly greater for HDC than for LDC (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.06-1.72, p= 0.02), C (HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.12-1.76, p= 0.003), or RT (HR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.68-2.61, p= < 0.001). Treatment with HDC compared to LDC was not associated with increased prevalence of dysphagia or neutropenia. HDC was associated with hearing loss when assessed at 9-12 months post-diagnosis (p =0.03). Conclusions: In SEER-Medicare beneficiaries with PULA-HNSCC of the OPC, HP, or L, OS was significantly better for HDC than LDC when accounting for baseline clinical and demographic characteristics and propensity score weights. Toxicities were similar between regimens, except for an increased incidence of the late acute toxicity of hearing loss in HDC. A regimen of HDC improves OS, but needs to be carefully assessed against increased toxicity risk, with hearing loss in particular.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Head and Neck Cancer

Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 6536)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.6536

Abstract #

6536

Poster Bd #

197

Abstract Disclosures