ARISTOTLE: A phase III trial comparing concurrent capecitabine with capecitabine and irinotecan (Ir) chemoradiation as preoperative treatment for MRI-defined locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Authors

null

David Sebag-Montefiore

University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

David Sebag-Montefiore , Richard Adams , Simon Gollins , Leslie M. Samuel , Robert Glynne-Jones , Robert Harte , Nicholas West , Philip Quirke , Arthur Sun Myint , Simon P Bach , Philip Parsons , Stephen Falk , Amandeep Singh Dhadda , Vivek Misra , Nick Brown , Gina Brown , Mark Harrison , Laura White , Marian Duggan , Andre Lopes

Organizations

University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom, North Wales Cancer Treatment Centre, Rhyl, United Kingdom, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom, Belfast Cancer Centre, Belfast, Ireland, Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, United Kingdom, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff, United Kingdom, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, United Kingdom, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield, United Kingdom, Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom, Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom, Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Other
Cancer Research UK

Background: Phase II studies reported high pathological complete response (pCR) rates and acceptable toxicity using irinotecan and fluoropyrimidine chemoradiation in LARC (ISRCTN:09351447). Methods: This phase III, multicentre, open-label trial funded by Cancer Research UK, randomly assigned (1:1) patients with MRI defined LARC threatening or involving resection margins without metastases, to pre-operative radiotherapy (RT) 45Gy/25 fractions combined with either capecitabine 900mg/m2(CRT) or 650 mg/m2 bd weekdays with Irinotecan iv once-weekly 60mg/m2 weeks 1-4 (IrCRT). The primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints include treatment compliance, safety and pCR. Results: 75 UK sites randomised 564 eligible patients from Oct/11 to July/18; 284 to CRT and 280 to IrCRT. 370 (66%) male; median age 61 years (range:29-83). Staging in both arms was similar: mrT3 (432/564(77%), mrT4 (89/564(16%); mrCRM involved (275/564(49%); threatened ≤1mm (215/564(38%). Compared with CRT, IrCRT patients were less likely to receive 45Gy RT (207/276(75%) vs 251/283(89%), p < 0.001) or receive ≥90% capecitabine dose in 188/276(68%) vs 253/283(89.4%)p < 0.001). A total of 204/276(74%) received ≥90% irinotecan dose. The grade 3-4 gastrointestinal adverse event rate was 21%(58/276) with IrCRT and 12%(34/283) with CRT (p = 0.004). Patients receiving IrCRT had significantly more diarrhoea 38/276(13.8%) vs 10/283(3.5%)p < 0.001) and neutropenia 27/276(9.8%) vs 3/283 (1.1%) p < 0.001). Two CRT and three IrCRT patients experienced a treatment related death. 237/276(86%) IrCRT and 241/283(85%) CRT patients had surgery. The median time from end of RT to surgery(10.6 weeks), the surgical procedure APE 262/478(55%), AR 189/478(40%), Hartmann’s 10/478(2%); and the surgical complications(any event) 38%(181/478) were similar in both arms. The pCR rate is available in > 95% patients and is 20.2%(46/228) for IrCRTvs.17.4%(40/230) for CRT (p = 0.45), A > 84% CRM-ve resection rate is similar in both arms. Conclusions: For patients with MRI defined high risk LARC low rates of CRM involvement were observed in both arms reflecting high quality multidisciplinary care. The addition of irinotecan did not significantly improve the pCR rate, was associated with a decrease in the RT and capecitabine compliance and a higher rate of adverse events. Surgical procedure or complications were unaffected. Longer follow-up is required to assess DFS and translational data. Clinical trial information: 09351447.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer–Local-Regional Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

09351447

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 4101)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.4101

Abstract #

4101

Poster Bd #

93

Abstract Disclosures