Neoadjuvant TCH (docetaxel/darboplatin/trastuzumab) versus EC-TH (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel/ trastuzumab ) in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (neoCARH): A randomised, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial.

Authors

null

Hong-Fei Gao

Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China, Guangzhou, China

Hong-Fei Gao , Zhiyong Wu , Ying Lin , Xiangyang Song , Yin Cao , Zhenzhen Liu , Qian-Jun Chen , Liulu Zhang , Ci-Qiu Yang , Mei Yang , Teng Zhu , Jieqing Li , Fei Ji , Min-Yi Cheng , Kun Wang

Organizations

Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China, Guangzhou, China, Department of Breast Surgery, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, China, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China, Department of Breast Surgery, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, China, Henan Tumor Hospital, Zhengzhou Henan, China, Departments of Breast Oncology, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China, Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: The optimal neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer is unknown. We wanted to compare the efficacy and safety of the anthracycline regimen EC-TH versus nonanthracycline regimen TCH in neoadjuvant setting for HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods: Patients with stage II or III HER2-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either four cycles of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of docetaxel and trastuzumab (EC-TH) every 3 weeks during all chemotherapy cycles, or six cycles of docetaxel and carboplatin plus trastuzumab (TCH) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (defined as the absence of invasive tumour cells in breast and axilla, ypT0/is ypN0). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03140553. Results: From September 2016 to November 2019, 140 patients were randomly assigned, and 131 were evaluable for the primary end-point. The pathological complete response was recorded in 25 (38.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 26.6–50.2) of 65 patients in the EC-TH group and in 37 (56.1%, 44.1–68.0) of 66 in the TCH group (p=0.044). In the EC-TH group, 15 (23.1%) of 65 patients underwent breast-conserving surgery. In the TCH group, 21 (31.8%) of 66 patients underwent breast-conserving surgery. There was no difference in the proportions of patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery between the two treatment groups (p=0·262). The most common adverse events were neutropenia (in 23 [35.4%] of 65 patients in the EC-TH group vs 27 [40.9%] of 66 in the TCH group), anemia(in 33 [50.8%] of 65 patients in the EC-TH group vs 34 [51.5%] of 66 in the TCH group) and thrombocytopenia (in 5 [7.7%] of 65 patient in the EC-TH group vs 17 [25.8%] of 66 in the TCH group). Conclusion: This is the first multicenter prospective randomised phase II trial compare EC-TH with TCH for neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. There was a similar incidence of AEs but a higher pCR rate in TCH arm compared with the EC-TH arm. TCH regimen might be a preferred approach in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Long-term follow-up is required to confirm these results. Clinical trial information: NCT03140553.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Neoadjuvant Therapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03140553

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 585)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.585

Abstract #

585

Poster Bd #

77

Abstract Disclosures