University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Keith Wheatley , Grace Holt , Cormac Owens , Jennifer Laidler , Dominique Valteau-Couanet , Marion Gambart , Victoria Castel , Natasha van Eijkelenburg , Aurora Castellano , Karsten Nysom , Nicolas U. Gerber , Genevieve Laureys , Ruth Lydia Ladenstein , Guy Makin , Sucheta Vaidya , Estelle Thebaud , Pamela Kearns , Andrew DJ Pearson , Lucas Moreno
Background: BEACON is a randomized phase 2 trial assessing whether inhibiting angiogenesis with bevacizumab adds to the activity of chemotherapy and evaluating chemotherapy regimens for children with RR-HRNB. Methods: Patients with RR-HRNB were eligible. There were randomizations (rand), in a 3x2 factorial design, to: T, IT or topotecan (To)-T, +/- B. Toxicity and response were reported in 2019 (ASCO, ESMO). Survival outcomes – progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) – for the I and B rands are reported here (To rand is still open). The B rand used a relaxed alpha (1-sided p=0.2) for PFS as its phase 2 success criterion; the I rand was Bayesian. Cox model hazard ratios (HR) <1.0 indicate benefit for I or B. Heterogeneity tests (HT) assessed interactions between B and I. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Results: From 2013-19, 160 patients were randomized to B v. no B, including 121 to I v. no I, with: median age 5.8 years; 113 and 47 measurable and evaluable disease; 67 and 93 refractory and relapsed disease; 35 had MYCN amplification. Median follow-up was 15.4 months. PFS and OS are shown in the table. In the main comparisons (I v. no I, B v. no B), I improved PFS and OS (98% probability that true HR<1.0 for both) and B just met its success criterion (PFS: 1p=0.20; OS: 1p=0.19). However, there was some, but not conclusive, evidence of a positive interaction between B and I for both PFS (HT: p=0.06) and OS (HT: p=0.12). If real, this would suggest that adding either I (IT) or B (BT) to T does not improve outcome, but adding both (BIT) does. Twice as many patients had serious adverse events with BIT (57%) than with T (26%) or IT (27%), with BT at 40%. Conclusions: The BEACON results show that single agent T is suboptimal. Statistical uncertainty about an interaction between I and B means two further interpretations are possible: 1) IT and possibly BT are better than T; 2) IT and BT are not better than T, but I and B together (BIT) are better. Hence, a definitive conclusion on the best combination(s) to take forward is not currently possible and further randomized evaluation is needed. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN40708286.
Randomization | Arm | 2-yr survival (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFS | HR (95% CI) | OS | HR (95% CI) | ||
B (n=160) | No B (T/IT) | 30 | 0.85 | 37 | 0.84 |
B (BT/BIT) | 35 | (0.59-1.23) | 51 | (0.56-1.24) | |
I (n=121) | No I (T/BT) | 27 | 0.66 | 34 | 0.63 |
I (IT/BIT) | 39 | (0.43-1.00) | 56 | (0.41-0.99) | |
I stratified by B | T (n=31) | 30 | 1.02 | 35 | 0.92 |
IT (n=30) | 24 | (0.57-1.84) | 38 | (0.49-1.73) | |
BT (n=30) | 24 | 0.45 | 34 | 0.46 | |
BIT (n=30) | 52 | (0.25-0.82) | 73 | (0.24-0.86) |
Cancer Research UK
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Selim Corbacioglu
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Godfrey Chi-Fung Chan
First Author: Lucas Moreno
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Gertjan VAN HAL