Randomized comparisons of bevacizumab (B) and irinotecan (I), added to temozolomide (T), in children with relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma (RR-HRNB): First survival results of the ITCC-SIOPEN BEACON-Neuroblastoma phase II trial.

Authors

null

Keith Wheatley

University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Keith Wheatley , Grace Holt , Cormac Owens , Jennifer Laidler , Dominique Valteau-Couanet , Marion Gambart , Victoria Castel , Natasha van Eijkelenburg , Aurora Castellano , Karsten Nysom , Nicolas U. Gerber , Genevieve Laureys , Ruth Lydia Ladenstein , Guy Makin , Sucheta Vaidya , Estelle Thebaud , Pamela Kearns , Andrew DJ Pearson , Lucas Moreno

Organizations

University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, University of Birmingham, Cancer Research Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom, Children and Adolescent Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, CHU de Toulouse-Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, France, Hospital Universiario y Politecnico La Fe Valencia, Valencia, Spain, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands, Division of Oncology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium, St. Anna Children's Hospital and St. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung, Department of Paediatrics, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester and Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom, CHU Nantes-Hôpital Mère-Enfant, Nantes, France, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey, United Kingdom, Hospital Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain

Research Funding

Other
Cancer Research UK

Background: BEACON is a randomized phase 2 trial assessing whether inhibiting angiogenesis with bevacizumab adds to the activity of chemotherapy and evaluating chemotherapy regimens for children with RR-HRNB. Methods: Patients with RR-HRNB were eligible. There were randomizations (rand), in a 3x2 factorial design, to: T, IT or topotecan (To)-T, +/- B. Toxicity and response were reported in 2019 (ASCO, ESMO). Survival outcomes – progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) – for the I and B rands are reported here (To rand is still open). The B rand used a relaxed alpha (1-sided p=0.2) for PFS as its phase 2 success criterion; the I rand was Bayesian. Cox model hazard ratios (HR) <1.0 indicate benefit for I or B. Heterogeneity tests (HT) assessed interactions between B and I. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Results: From 2013-19, 160 patients were randomized to B v. no B, including 121 to I v. no I, with: median age 5.8 years; 113 and 47 measurable and evaluable disease; 67 and 93 refractory and relapsed disease; 35 had MYCN amplification. Median follow-up was 15.4 months. PFS and OS are shown in the table. In the main comparisons (I v. no I, B v. no B), I improved PFS and OS (98% probability that true HR<1.0 for both) and B just met its success criterion (PFS: 1p=0.20; OS: 1p=0.19). However, there was some, but not conclusive, evidence of a positive interaction between B and I for both PFS (HT: p=0.06) and OS (HT: p=0.12). If real, this would suggest that adding either I (IT) or B (BT) to T does not improve outcome, but adding both (BIT) does. Twice as many patients had serious adverse events with BIT (57%) than with T (26%) or IT (27%), with BT at 40%. Conclusions: The BEACON results show that single agent T is suboptimal. Statistical uncertainty about an interaction between I and B means two further interpretations are possible: 1) IT and possibly BT are better than T; 2) IT and BT are not better than T, but I and B together (BIT) are better. Hence, a definitive conclusion on the best combination(s) to take forward is not currently possible and further randomized evaluation is needed. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN40708286.

PFS and OS by treatment arm.

RandomizationArm2-yr survival (%)
PFSHR (95% CI)OSHR (95% CI)
B (n=160)No B (T/IT)300.85370.84
B (BT/BIT)35(0.59-1.23)51(0.56-1.24)
I (n=121)No I (T/BT)270.66340.63
I (IT/BIT)39(0.43-1.00)56(0.41-0.99)
I stratified by BT (n=31)301.02350.92
IT (n=30)24(0.57-1.84)38(0.49-1.73)
BT (n=30)240.45340.46
BIT (n=30)52(0.25-0.82)73(0.24-0.86)

Cancer Research UK

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Pediatric Oncology I

Track

Pediatric Oncology

Sub Track

Pediatric Solid Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

ISRCTN40708286

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 10501)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.10501

Abstract #

10501

Abstract Disclosures