Combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with rare gynaecological malignancies.

Authors

null

Oliver Klein

Medical Oncology Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia

Oliver Klein , Damien Kee , Bo Gao , Ben Markman , Linda R. Mileshkin , Clare L. Scott , Yeojeong So , Richelle Linklater , Andreas Behren , Jodie Palmer , Matteo S. Carlino , Jonathan S. Cebon

Organizations

Medical Oncology Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Monash Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Australia, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Heidelberg, Australia

Research Funding

Other Government Agency
Australian Federal Department of Health

Background: Up to 50% of gynecological cancers are considered rare. The outcome of these patients (pts) is poor given a lack of scientific and clinical knowledge. Immunotherapy using single agent anti- PD-1/PD-L1 treatment (tx) has shown only modest activity in patients with common gynecological malignancies, such as high grade serous ovarian cancer (ca) and microsatellite stable endometrial ca. Combined CTLA-4/PD-1 blockade using ipilimumab (ipi) and nivolumab (nivo) has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to single agent anti-PD-1 therapy in pts with advanced melanoma and renal cell ca. To date, no trials have been undertaken with ipi/nivo in patients with rare gynecological malignancies. Methods: 41 pts with advanced rare gynecological malignancies were enrolled into the CA209-538 trial. Pts received nivo 3mg/kg and ipi 1mg/kg q 3 weekly for four doses, followed by nivo 3mg/kg q 2 weekly. Tx continued for up to 96 weeks, or until disease progression or the development of unacceptable toxicity. Response (RECIST 1.1) was assessed every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR = CR +PR + SD). Exploratory endpoints include correlation of efficacy with biomarkers (incl PD-L1/TMB). Results: Pts with 10 rare tumor types were enrolled (Table). 39/41 pts have received prior therapy (1-7 lines). Objective responses were observed in 11 pts (27%) including pts with vaginal SCC, ovarian clear cell and low grade serous ca, ovarian and uterine carcinosarcoma, uterine clear cell, uterine serous ca and leiomyosarcoma. A further 9 pts had SD as their best radiological response resulting in a CBR of 49%. The median duration of response had not been reached (range 3.5 – 25+ months) with seven responses being ongoing. 63% of pts experienced an immune related adverse event (irAEs) with 4 pts developing Grade 3/4 irAEs. Conclusions: Ipi/Nivo tx demonstrates efficacy in a range of different rare gynecological cancers with a significant number of durable responses being observed. Tumor agnostic biomarkers are required to assist with better patient selection. Clinical trial information: NCT02923934

Ovarian carcinosarcoma5
Low grade serous ovarian ca4
Ovarian clear cell ca5
Ovarian granulosa cell tumour2
Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumour2
Uterine serous ca8
Uterine clear cell2
Uterine carcinosarcoma4
Uterine leiomyosarcoma4
Vulva/Vaginal SCC5

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Other Gynecologic Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02923934

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 6091)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.6091

Abstract #

6091

Poster Bd #

262

Abstract Disclosures