SEER-Medicare study of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: Real-world treatment patterns, survival, and expenditures 2010 to 2016.

Authors

null

Jan Sieluk

Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ

Jan Sieluk , Amin Haiderali , Min Huang , Lingfeng Yang , KONSTANTINOS TRYFONIDIS , Kim M. Hirshfield

Organizations

Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.

Background: In the US, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents about 10–20% of breast cancers. Current information about the clinical and economic burden of early-stage TNBC in elderly patients is lacking. Methods: We used the SEER-Medicare database to identify patients with continuous Medicare Parts A/B enrollment, ≥66 years old, newly diagnosed between 2010 - 2015 (followed until 2016) with stage II-III TNBC, who initiated systemic neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant (including chemotherapy and radiation) therapy. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) from diagnosis were estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM). Healthcare costs were determined during neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods. Results: Of 1569 patients ( > 99% women), 94 (6%) received neoadjuvant therapy, 1162 (74%) received adjuvant therapy, and 313 (20%) received both (neo/adj; Table). Age and race/ethnicity distributions were comparable in the three cohorts. Primary tumor T stage was T1c/T2 for 43%, 83%, and 58% in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and neo/adj, respectively, and T3 for 14%, 10%, and 15%, respectively. The most common systemic regimens in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods were a taxane +/- anthracycline; 21% and 67% of patients in adjuvant and neo/adj cohorts received radiation therapy after surgery. Most claims were for outpatient treatment; hospitalizations were uncommon. The total mean expenditures per patient per month were US$10,620 and $24,408 during neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods, respectively. Conclusions: This study provides insights into patient characteristics, as well as clinical and economic outcomes for elderly patients with early-stage TNBC, treated from 2010-2016 in the US, highlighting the high monetary burden of TNBC and poor outcomes associated with stage III patients.

Characteristics and survival of patients with early-stage TNBC.

Neoadjuvant Only
(N = 94)
Adjuvant Only
(N = 1162)
Both Neo/Adj
(N = 313)
Follow-up duration, median (range), mo20.2 (2.4-84.1)36.0 (3.3-84.1)27.2 (6.8-84.1)
Alive at end of follow up, n (%)43 (46)822 (71)215 (69)
Stage II, n (%)48 (51)928 (80)165 (53)
Stage III, n (%)46 (49)234 (20)148 (47)
KM estimates: median (95% CI), mo
OS – All patients23.3 (20.6–51.1)NR (NR)77.6 (55.6–NR)
OS stage IINR (NR)NR (NR)77.6 (77.6–NR)
OS stage III21.8 (12.1–27.1)43.1 (36.3–51.7)37.8 (27.3–56.1)
EFS from neoadjuvant start23.1 (19.7–37.0)--30.1 (24.2–45.9)

(Data cut-off 31Dec2016. NR, not reached.)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Breast Cancer - Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Adjuvant Therapy

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr e12512)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.e12512

Abstract #

e12512

Abstract Disclosures