Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ
Jan Sieluk , Amin Haiderali , Min Huang , Lingfeng Yang , KONSTANTINOS TRYFONIDIS , Kim M. Hirshfield
Background: In the US, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents about 10–20% of breast cancers. Current information about the clinical and economic burden of early-stage TNBC in elderly patients is lacking. Methods: We used the SEER-Medicare database to identify patients with continuous Medicare Parts A/B enrollment, ≥66 years old, newly diagnosed between 2010 - 2015 (followed until 2016) with stage II-III TNBC, who initiated systemic neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant (including chemotherapy and radiation) therapy. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) from diagnosis were estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM). Healthcare costs were determined during neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods. Results: Of 1569 patients ( > 99% women), 94 (6%) received neoadjuvant therapy, 1162 (74%) received adjuvant therapy, and 313 (20%) received both (neo/adj; Table). Age and race/ethnicity distributions were comparable in the three cohorts. Primary tumor T stage was T1c/T2 for 43%, 83%, and 58% in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and neo/adj, respectively, and T3 for 14%, 10%, and 15%, respectively. The most common systemic regimens in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods were a taxane +/- anthracycline; 21% and 67% of patients in adjuvant and neo/adj cohorts received radiation therapy after surgery. Most claims were for outpatient treatment; hospitalizations were uncommon. The total mean expenditures per patient per month were US$10,620 and $24,408 during neoadjuvant and adjuvant periods, respectively. Conclusions: This study provides insights into patient characteristics, as well as clinical and economic outcomes for elderly patients with early-stage TNBC, treated from 2010-2016 in the US, highlighting the high monetary burden of TNBC and poor outcomes associated with stage III patients.
Neoadjuvant Only (N = 94) | Adjuvant Only (N = 1162) | Both Neo/Adj (N = 313) | |
---|---|---|---|
Follow-up duration, median (range), mo | 20.2 (2.4-84.1) | 36.0 (3.3-84.1) | 27.2 (6.8-84.1) |
Alive at end of follow up, n (%) | 43 (46) | 822 (71) | 215 (69) |
Stage II, n (%) | 48 (51) | 928 (80) | 165 (53) |
Stage III, n (%) | 46 (49) | 234 (20) | 148 (47) |
KM estimates: median (95% CI), mo | |||
OS – All patients | 23.3 (20.6–51.1) | NR (NR) | 77.6 (55.6–NR) |
OS stage II | NR (NR) | NR (NR) | 77.6 (77.6–NR) |
OS stage III | 21.8 (12.1–27.1) | 43.1 (36.3–51.7) | 37.8 (27.3–56.1) |
EFS from neoadjuvant start | 23.1 (19.7–37.0) | -- | 30.1 (24.2–45.9) |
(Data cut-off 31Dec2016. NR, not reached.)
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Jay C. Andersen
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Lauren Caitlin Curry
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Saroj Niraula
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Lawrence Chang