Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Chun Loo Gan , Shaan Dudani , Connor Wells , Ziad Bakouny , Nazli Dizman , Sumanta K. Pal , Bernadett Szabados , Lori Wood , Christian K. Kollmannsberger , Neeraj Agarwal , Frede Donskov , Naveen S. Basappa , Georg A. Bjarnason , Francis Parnis , Camillo Porta , Ian D. Davis , Ulka N. Vaishampayan , Ravindran Kanesvaran , Toni K. Choueiri , Daniel Yick Chin Heng
Background: IO combination therapies [including IOIO and IO/vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor (IOVE) combinations] in mRCC have been approved based on registration clinical trials that have strict eligibility criteria. The clinical outcomes of trial ineligible patients who are treated with first-line IOIO or IOVE combinations are unknown. Methods: Metastatic RCC patients treated with first-line IOIO or IOVE were retrospectively deemed ineligible for clinical trials (according to commonly used inclusion/exclusion criteria in IO trials) if they had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) < 70%, no clear-cell component, brain metastases, hemoglobin (Hb) < 9 g/dL, eGFR < 40 mL/min, platelet count of < 100,000/mm3, and/or neutrophil count < 1500/mm3. Time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from time of starting first-line IO therapy. Results: Overall, 26% (155/592) of patients in the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) were deemed ineligible for clinical trials by the above criteria. Baseline characteristics are listed in Table. The reasons for ineligibility were: no clear-cell component (34%, 53/155), Hb < 9g/dL (28%, 44/155), eGFR < 40 mL/min (19%, 30/155), brain metastases (19%, 29/155), KPS < 70% (14%, 21/155), platelet < 100,000/mm3 (3%, 4/155) and neutrophil count < 1500/mm3 (0%, 0/155). Between ineligible versus eligible patients, the response rate, median TTF and median OS of first-line IOIO or IOVE was 34% vs 46% (p = 0.02), 4.2 vs 9.7 months (p < 0.01), and 25.3 vs 44.4 months (p < 0.01), respectively. When adjusted by the IMDC prognostic categories, the HR for death between trial ineligible and trial eligible patients was 1.50 (95% CI 1.05-2.14). Conclusions: The number of patients that are ineligible for clinical trials is substantial and their outcomes are inferior. These data may guide patient counselling and specific trials addressing the unmet needs of protocol ineligible patients are warranted.
Baseline Characteristics | TRIAL INELIGIBLE (N = 155) | TRIAL ELIGIBLE (N = 437) | P-VALUE |
---|---|---|---|
Median Age | 62 | 63 | 0.24 |
Male | 63% (98/155) | 73% (318/437) | 0.03 |
Sarcomatoid histology | 25% (29/115) | 20% (63/314) | 0.25 |
Nephrectomy | 66% (102/155) | 75% (326/437) | 0.04 |
IOIO | 63% (97/155) | 57% (247/437) | 0.19 |
IOVE | 37% (58/155) | 43% (190/437) | |
Received second line therapy | 33% (50/155) | 34% (148/437) | 0.72 |
IMDC Risk Group | |||
Favorable | 11% (15/138) | 19% (74/385) | < 0.01 |
Intermediate | 47% (65/138) | 65% (251/385) | |
Poor | 42% (58/138) | 16% (60/385) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Georges Gebrael
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Audreylie Lemelin
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Ana-Alicia Beltran-Bless
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Kathryn Fortune