Twenty-four months RFS and updated toxicity data from OpACIN-neo: A study to identify the optimal dosing schedule of neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) in stage III melanoma.

Authors

Elisa Rozeman

Elisa A. Rozeman

Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Elisa A. Rozeman , Irene L.M. Reijers , Esmée P Hoefsmit , Karolina Sikorska , Oscar Krijgsman , Bart A. Van De Wiel , Petros Dimitriadis , Hanna Eriksson , Maria Gonzalez , Lindsay G Grijpink-Ongering , Ron M. Kerkhoven , Annegien Broeks , Willem M.C. Klop , Andrew Spillane , Robyn PM Saw , Alexander Christopher Jonathan Van Akkooi , Richard A. Scolyer , Alexander M. Menzies , Georgina V. Long , Christian U. Blank

Organizations

Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Department of Statistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, Netherlands, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, Australia, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia, The University of Sydney, Melanoma Institute Australia and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
BMS

Background: Early results of the OpACIN-neo study testing 3 different dosing schedules of neoadjuvant IPI + NIVO demonstrated that 2 cycles IPI 1mg/kg + NIVO 3mg/kg (IPI1NIVO3, arm B) was the most favorable schedule with 20% grade 3-4 immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs) and a pathologic response rate (pRR) of 77%. After a median follow-up (FU) of 8.3 months, none of the 64 patients (pts) with a pathologic (path) response ( < 50% viable tumor cells) versus 9/21 (43%) without a path response had relapsed. Here, we present the updated 2-year RFS, EFS and long-term toxicity data. Methods: In the phase 2 multi-center OpACIN-neo trial, 86 stage III melanoma pts with resectable and RECIST 1.1 measurable lymph node metastasis were randomized between 3 different dosing schedules of neoadjuvant IPI + NIVO: arm A: 2x IPI3+NIVO1 Q3W (n = 30), arm B: 2x IPI1+NIVO3 Q3W (n = 30), and arm C: 2x IPI3 Q3W followed by 2x NIVO3 Q2W (n = 26). Lymph node dissection was scheduled at week 6. Primary endpoints were toxicity, radiologic RR and pRR; RFS and EFS were secondary endpoints. Results: After a median FU of 24.6 months, the median RFS and EFS was not reached in any of the 3 arms. In total, 2 pts progressed before surgery, 12 pts relapsed (11 pts without path response and 1 pt with pCR) and 5 pts died (4 due to melanoma and one pt due to toxicity). Estimated 24-months RFS was 84% (95% CI 76-92%) for the total population, 97% (95% CI 93-100%) for pts with a path response and 36% (95% CI 17-74%) for pts without a path response. Estimated 24-months EFS for the total population was 82% (95% CI 74-91%). RFS and EFS did not differ between the arms. Of the 81 pts alive, 55 (68%) have ongoing irAEs; only 2 (3%) pts have ≥ grade 3 irAEs. Most frequent ongoing irAEs were vitiligo (35%), fatigue (14%), sicca syndrome (11%), rash (10%), arthralgia (7%) and endocrine toxicities (20%). 17 pts need hormone replacement therapy: 11 (14%) thyroid hormone and 7 (9%) hydrocortisone. No difference between treatment arms was observed. Ongoing surgery-related AEs were observed in 31 (38%) pts of which lymphedema was seen most frequently (17 pts; 21%). Conclusions: Extended follow-up data shows that 2 cycles of neoadjuvant IPI + NIVO without adjuvant therapy induces durable RFS. While almost no ongoing high-grade irAEs were observed, the majority of pts have low-grade ongoing toxicities. These outcomes strongly support the need to test 2 cycles of neoadjuvant IPI1+NIVO3 versus adjuvant anti-PD-1 in a randomized phase 3 trial. Clinical trial information: NCT02977052

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Local-Regional Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02977052

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 10015)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.10015

Abstract #

10015

Poster Bd #

364

Abstract Disclosures